skankhunt42nuclear/shill
boozers DNI
3mo ago#6882666
Edited 3mo ago
spent 0 currency on pings
@DrTransmisia iirc tried to make a page for us a year or two ago (the draft might actually still be there) but it was rejected by the wikipedos () for not having enough non-primary sources (which is the excuse they give when they want to reject a controversial article that the wiki commie mafia doesn't approve of)
I'm just saying the "Dr" part is a little intimidating. It feels like you're trying to hold that over people's heads that you're more educated than them.
unironically @MoonMetropolis might be our way in, add a reference to his Wikipedia page saying he's now an administrator of the trolling forum rDrama and then from there say there should be an rDrama Wikipedia page.
I would say that's great, we'll push the narrative that we're all badass hardcore criminals, the most dangerous people on the internet. But then I remember that cute twink Liz Fong-Jones could just flip a switch and shut us down across the world if he got mad at us.
You could try adding it to rationalwiki, they already have a subsection of an article that mentions you, and they mention rdrama here, they really like pointing out connections between 2 things they hate, and they allow citing most sources (articles about rightoids and conspiratards will often link directly to the website operated by the article's subject, or an archived version of it).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
@DrTransmisia iirc tried to make a page for us a year or two ago (the draft might actually still be there) but it was rejected by the wikipedos () for not having enough non-primary sources (which is the excuse they give when they want to reject a controversial article that the wiki commie mafia doesn't approve of)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DrTransmisia#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation%3A_Rdrama.net_%28April_14%29
Yeah the draft has been deleted but here's Dr T's profile with the rejection messages
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Maybe "DrTransmisia" isn't the best to use when dealing with Wikipedia admins?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I've been assured he's the most subtle dramanaut.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sars I'm sending in bardmarseytler88 prepare sars
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
wdym
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm just saying the "Dr" part is a little intimidating. It feels like you're trying to hold that over people's heads that you're more educated than them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
unironically @MoonMetropolis might be our way in, add a reference to his Wikipedia page saying he's now an administrator of the trolling forum rDrama and then from there say there should be an rDrama Wikipedia page.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The WIkipedo jannies will remove it instantly. They don't care about facts or building an encyclopedia. All they care about is pushing a narrative.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I would say that's great, we'll push the narrative that we're all badass hardcore criminals, the most dangerous people on the internet. But then I remember that cute twink Liz Fong-Jones could just flip a switch and shut us down across the world if he got mad at us.
I miss the 1990s.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You could try adding it to rationalwiki, they already have a subsection of an article that mentions you, and they mention rdrama here, they really like pointing out connections between 2 things they hate, and they allow citing most sources (articles about rightoids and conspiratards will often link directly to the website operated by the article's subject, or an archived version of it).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
!wikihaters can you believe this shit?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes - easily.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's terribly written, someone else should rewrite the article from scratch to begin with
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context