I have no idea if there's anything really interesting in these since I didn't read the article
/h/mnn
The_Homocracy
Cute/Twink
๐ฃ๐ฑ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ช๐ ๐ช๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ท๐ญ๐ช ๐ฒ๐ผ ๐ท๐ธ ๐ต๐ธ๐ท๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ธ๐น๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ธ๐ท๐ช๐ต
11mo ago
(jalopnik.com)
114 thread views
#173374
The Tesla Files
https://jalopnik.com/whistleblower-drops-100-gigabytes-of-tesla-secrets-to-g-1850476542
- 9
- 13
Top Poster of the Day:
Patsy
Current Registered Users: 25,864
Welcome to the Marsey News Network, the official news hole of rdrama! This is where you post anything that happened on the news. Politics, general news, good news, any new in any topic that doesn't have it's own hole from any source is welcome! However, if you post an unreliable source, it may be flaired appropriately. Wingcucks welcome and slapfights encouraged!
Rules:
1. Follow sitewide rules
2. Post News
3. Have Fun! Don't be boring.
4. No chudrama-tier content. Rightoid news sources are allowed, but anything that belongs in chudrama or could get the site deplatformed will be moved to chudrama.
5. @DarkDeity and @Spiderman has the right to post whatever news they want in this hole
/h/mnn LOG /h/mnn MODS /h/mnn EXILEES /h/mnn FOLLOWERS /h/mnn BLOCKERS
Live commit: 0c414fa
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah I'm not reading it either but maybe someone here is more neurodivergent than us and can TLDR
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm neurodivergent and was having a Tesla related debate with friends. The gist of this report they reference is that Tesla has been misleading people and stonewalling regulators, often by never admitting fault. It seems to cast Tesla self driving features as not only being half-baked, but dangerous. Multiple people, allegedly verified by the journ*list mentioned in this article, have said they were injured or in an accident with minimal redress from Tesla. Tesla only communicated verbally, and all documentation of the "technical reports" were closely held by the company.
I would say since journ*lists are saying this, it's probably not true in the way they're framing it. But it could be. We just don't know because journ*lists are r-slurred. There's no publicly available evidence, and the issue really comes down to "do you think journ*lists would make something up for clicks?" versus "do you think a billionaire would hurt people for money?"
This is the official position of C-SPAN. If you have any questions or comments, please call and say something unhinged.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Just use ChatGPT to TLDR it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context