Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'll agree with you, but only because it's in NYC.

If it was pretty much anywhere else he'd get off scot free.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Since he waited to shoot the dude in the back probably not.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you look at the video, he pulled the gun when the guy started attacking his wife.

To act in self-defense or defense OF OTHERS, a person may use an amount of force reasonably believed necessary to protect himself OR ANOTHER from imminent harm.

so probably yes

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He pushed his own wife back

>Mathurin spots the gun but waves it off. He turns around and begins walking toward his apartment, at which point the neighbor opens fire and strikes Mathurin, who falls to the floor.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16987788529725175.webp

Literally shooting him in the back. That's practically never legally justified.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He pushed his own wife back

It's not some gotcha that it's his wife.

Act like a black dude never hit his woman before.

Guys waving a weapon around and acting like he's going to attack someone. Shooting is justified. Simple as.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

People like you are part of the reason fun guns have been stolen from us.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseybrainlet:

yes. i'm responsible for gun control because i air towards self defense.

good take

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No it's because you're a reckless r-slur that encourages unjustified and unlawful shootings as self defense.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's your opinion, and I don't agree with it. :marseysipping:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.