One of my coworkers was talking about this yesterday. He seemed to think a full 25% of all SFH purchases in the last year were institutional investors. I told him I straight up didn't believe that, it's an absurd number.
In fact, research from Freddie Mac shows the U.S. needs to increase housing supply by 3.8 million units to meet existing demand.
According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, the demand for affordable rental units is even higher—with an estimated shortage of 7.3 million such rental units nationwide.
What does this even fricking mean? Like what do they mean by "demand for affordable rental units"? People who just think their rent is too high? lmao
It's a stupid populist bill that undoubtedly relies on some sort of argument that would embarrass an econ 101 student.
Usually there's hand-waving implicit theory of how institutional investors create vacancies. Or alternatively they identify some weird behavior that is the result of some other policy (eg. expectations of bailouts if investments go south) and rather than address the root cause of the weird behavior they just try to legislate it away.
EvilUbiecute/twink 11mo ago#5556745
Edited 11mo ago
spent 0 currency on pings
Today I will ban these suppliers from building or buying housing.
Consequently, we will also prohibit owners from selling to these buyers with an immense amount of money.
This will increase the supply of housing, thereby lowering prices.
This is a lot like rent control, which seems great in the short-run, but r-slurs are oblivious to long-term problems (which they will blame on the market, because again they are r-slurred).
Welcome to the Marsey News Network, the official news hole of rdrama! This is where you post anything that happened on the news. Politics, general news, good news, any new in any topic that doesn't have it's own hole from any source is welcome! However, if you post an unreliable source, it may be flaired appropriately. Wingcucks welcome and slapfights encouraged!
Rules:
1. Follow sitewide rules
2. Post News
3. Have Fun! Don't be boring.
4. No chudrama-tier content. Rightoid news sources are allowed, but anything that belongs in chudrama or could get the site deplatformed will be moved to chudrama.
5. @DarkDeity and @Spiderman has the right to post whatever news they want in this hole
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Only US citizens should be allowed to buy homes in the US.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Unironically agree 100%.
Isn't it that way in many other countries too? It's not like the US would be treading new ground lol.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
it should be reciprocal.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
US citizens should be forced to buy houses?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Homes should be forced to buy US citizens.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
One of my coworkers was talking about this yesterday. He seemed to think a full 25% of all SFH purchases in the last year were institutional investors. I told him I straight up didn't believe that, it's an absurd number.
What does this even fricking mean? Like what do they mean by "demand for affordable rental units"? People who just think their rent is too high? lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Affordable rental units basically means no housing.
It means people want cheap rental units that white trash and s don't live near.
The issue being that all those units are expensive.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
All else equal, everyone wants everything to cost less. This is an utterly r-slurred goal to pursue through government policy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's a stupid populist bill that undoubtedly relies on some sort of argument that would embarrass an econ 101 student.
Usually there's hand-waving implicit theory of how institutional investors create vacancies. Or alternatively they identify some weird behavior that is the result of some other policy (eg. expectations of bailouts if investments go south) and rather than address the root cause of the weird behavior they just try to legislate it away.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Kevin oleary is a massive cute twink r-slur who made all his money off of a shitty scam company during the dotcom bubble
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
He's a “professional” butthole.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Snapshots:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Very nice.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Today I will ban these suppliers from building or buying housing.
Consequently, we will also prohibit owners from selling to these buyers with an immense amount of money.
This will increase the supply of housing, thereby lowering prices.
This is a lot like rent control, which seems great in the short-run, but r-slurs are oblivious to long-term problems (which they will blame on the market, because again they are r-slurred).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context