John Cochrane: In my analysis, inflation mostly came from the government's $5 trillion in COVID and post-COVID deficits. The government essentially sent people $5 trillion with no plans to pay the money back. People tried to spend it, driving up prices.
the reason people couldn't spend it was massive supply chain disruptions followed by huge sdemand shocks from the people that spent months not going out and doing anything lmao.
like you understand what you just linked is saying the same thing as bernanke, right?
for some reason they're claiming the spending was the cause and not the supply chains collapsing, causing demand shocks.
They didn't just "try" and spend it.....they did spend it. You do understand that just handing thousands of dollars to everyone causes prices to go up when they go out and spend it right? Or does that simple concept not really soak in for you
People being forced to stay home absolutely plummeted manufacturing supply. There are a lot of manufacturing plants that are simply designed to run 24/7... if not, the machinery gets damaged. (Ask anyone that works in the chemical plants in Texas.)
Welcome to the Marsey News Network, the official news hole of rdrama! This is where you post anything that happened on the news. Politics, general news, good news, any new in any topic that doesn't have it's own hole from any source is welcome! However, if you post an unreliable source, it may be flaired appropriately. Wingcucks welcome and slapfights encouraged!
Rules:
1. Follow sitewide rules
2. Post News
3. Have Fun! Don't be boring.
4. No chudrama-tier content. Rightoid news sources are allowed, but anything that belongs in chudrama or could get the site deplatformed will be moved to chudrama.
5. @DarkDeity and @Spiderman has the right to post whatever news they want in this hole
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Okay and? Bernanke and Blanchard doesn't = a "general consensus"
https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/grumpy-economist-weighs-inflations-causes-its-cures
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the reason people couldn't spend it was massive supply chain disruptions followed by huge sdemand shocks from the people that spent months not going out and doing anything lmao.
like you understand what you just linked is saying the same thing as bernanke, right?
for some reason they're claiming the spending was the cause and not the supply chains collapsing, causing demand shocks.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They didn't just "try" and spend it.....they did spend it. You do understand that just handing thousands of dollars to everyone causes prices to go up when they go out and spend it right? Or does that simple concept not really soak in for you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
was supply lower due to the supply chains collapsing?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Was demand higher because of free money being stuffed down everyone's throat?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
demand might have been higher, but primarily due to people stockpiling money during the shutdowns lol.
but supply was MUCH lower.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I disagree
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
People being forced to stay home absolutely plummeted manufacturing supply. There are a lot of manufacturing plants that are simply designed to run 24/7... if not, the machinery gets damaged. (Ask anyone that works in the chemical plants in Texas.)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
No, everything I wanted or needed was fully stocked from 2019-2022
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context