Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Antisemites exploit safety features on platform formerly known as Twitter, including by falsely saying that victim of historic 1915 antisemitic lynching was guilty of r*pe

>including by falsely saying that (Leo Frank) ... was guilty of r*pe

>by falsely saying that Leo Frank was guilty

>falsely

:#marseythinkorino:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He probably wasn't though

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Falsely claimjng rittenhouse was innocent

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Fact check: Rottenhouse the racist was never found innocent, only "not guilty beyond reasonable doubt"

Our verdict: Pants on fire!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

?? I don't know what this means.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Slow in the head, eh?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not an explanation

Nobody says Rittenhouse didn't shoot anyone, so it's not really comparable.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Antisemites claim rittenhouse was found innocent but independent fact checkers dispute that claim

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.