https://youtube.com/watch?v=wD4xrnzKN1Y
A full 2 hour cover of Ted's Ph.D dissertation if any of you are curious with the first half an hour covering all the prerequisites to understanding.
I will admit even though I've taken 2 semesters of measure theory once it reaches ~1:15:00 I have no fricking idea what he is talking about.
Cool video though
.webp?h=8 "Merry Fistmas!")
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I have only the most rudimentary understanding of measure theory, much of it probably under the guise of other fields (I.e. my understanding of the concept of almost everywhere). I think the only direct study of it I've done is related to the Vitali set.
Do I have the slightest hope of understanding this, and if not, what book should I read at work in the bathroom and/or loader?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
eh I mean you could try to but even though he tries his best to make it as presentable as possible it is very technical and the proofs will be lost on you (I know once the video passes the hour mark the proof is basically lost on me too) If you'd like to read some more on measure theory there there is an alright textbook that I used: Measure, Integral and Probability, by Marek Capinski and Ekkehard Kopp
(It assumes knowledge of real analysis but other than that its mostly entry level)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It just so happens that I would. I think my real analysis is decently strong - at least good enough for Baby Rudin. That good enough?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah definitely, if you did Baby Rudin then this book is supposed to be the next step after.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yo ty boss I'll bring it with me to work
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context