Redactor0naori/oppa
Darklands shill, do not engage
8mo ago#6131454
spent 0 currency on pings
When I read Julius Caesar's account of the Gallic Wars I suspected it was mostly bullshit. Because every tribe he runs into is the enemy and they all fight really hard but he just barely beats them. He never has an easy victory.
It's literally just him describing for like four pages how they built a neat bridge over the Rhine. There were wars in the book that got glossed over in less detail.
Noahfacemar/she
By far the straggiest commenter on this site
Redactor0 8mo ago#6131694
Edited 8mo ago
spent 0 currency on pings
For ancient battles they usually tried to make the enemy numbers more impressive by including their entire population, including women and children/elderly. For most of those battles you can comfortably reduce the enemy numbers by like 2/3.
Even though he still was outnumbered basically every battle even with accurate numbers, he was sending professional legions against shit-smeared frenchmen so he usually had the upper hand in the field (although Rome did have famously awful cavalry compared to the Gauls or Germoids). A lot of generals could have won many of his specific battles but almost no one could have managed the entire campaign. His real genius was in things like maintaining his supply lines, knowing how to be in the right part of Gaul at the right time, playing the tribes against each other to keep them from uniting until it was too late. He was one of the best ever at stalling, retreating, doing whatever he could to prevent an engagement when he didn't have the upper hand, and knowing exactly when to pull the trigger when everything lined up in his favor.
Though some of the finer details are definitely false, there were so many soldiers and people with him and so many people who'd use that it was a fabrication as their advantage that by and large it's pretty accurate.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
When I read Julius Caesar's account of the Gallic Wars I suspected it was mostly bullshit. Because every tribe he runs into is the enemy and they all fight really hard but he just barely beats them. He never has an easy victory.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The part about the bridge was my favourite. You know he was just seriously stoked about building a cool bridge.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
qrd please
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's literally just him describing for like four pages how they built a neat bridge over the Rhine. There were wars in the book that got glossed over in less detail.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
For ancient battles they usually tried to make the enemy numbers more impressive by including their entire population, including women and children/elderly. For most of those battles you can comfortably reduce the enemy numbers by like 2/3.
Even though he still was outnumbered basically every battle even with accurate numbers, he was sending professional legions against shit-smeared frenchmen so he usually had the upper hand in the field (although Rome did have famously awful cavalry compared to the Gauls or Germoids). A lot of generals could have won many of his specific battles but almost no one could have managed the entire campaign. His real genius was in things like maintaining his supply lines, knowing how to be in the right part of Gaul at the right time, playing the tribes against each other to keep them from uniting until it was too late. He was one of the best ever at stalling, retreating, doing whatever he could to prevent an engagement when he didn't have the upper hand, and knowing exactly when to pull the trigger when everything lined up in his favor.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Though some of the finer details are definitely false, there were so many soldiers and people with him and so many people who'd use that it was a fabrication as their advantage that by and large it's pretty accurate.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context