Scenario 1:
rest of the WW1 world.
Scenario 2:
Rest of the WW2 world. ( nukes allowed for WW2 world too use )
Scenario 3:
Vietnam war
Scenario 4:
The US army from WW1
Scenario 5:
The US army from WW2 ( nukes allowed for WW2 America too use )
Scenario 6:
The US army from the Vietnam war
Scenario 7:
The US army from 2001 ( Nukes not allowed )
Scenario 8:
The rest of the world from 1991 ( Nukes allowed for rest of the world )
This post rests on native land
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You need to define what 'winning' means. There's a significant gulf between neutralizing the capabilities of a traditional military force, establishing DEI initiatives in Pakistan, and nuclear annihilation. Are you gonna rebuild and occupy the rest of the planet? With what army? What about administration? And for how long? What about trade? Ruling is hard. This was maybe my answer to OP, whom, as much as I admire his curiosity, I do quibble with. We look at real history and it's not that simple. But OP doesn't ask the question: What was America's tax policy? Did they maintain a standing army? What did the US do in times of flood and famine? And what about all these Indians? By the end of the war, Canada is gone but all of the Indians aren't gone — they're in the mountains. Did the US pursue a policy of systematic genocide and kill them? Even the little baby Indians, in their little Indian cradles?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Winning means defeating the other army.
This post rests on native land
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context