Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How are we defining rich?

Simple. Rich is whatever level of wealth I can get away with hating on :brainletchair:

This is the key question. I have friends worth a few million dollars, I have no hatred for them, or other people in that situation. That is what I would love to have for myself and my family. But billionaires? That isn't the same scale, that isn't necessary for the world, no one has "earned" that, no one deserves that, no one needs that. I'm not saying I hate every billionaire, some of them are good world citizens, but billionaires shouldn't exist.

Case in point.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

but billionaires shouldn't exist.

This is such a weird idea. How can you say that they "shouldn't" exist? You make something that everyone wants, and everyone gives you money for it. This increases exponentially alongside the human population.

The only reason they should not exist is by inventing thousands of microcriteria in your head to contstruct an infinitely convoluded idea of a society thats 100% subjective

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How are we defining rich?

"Anyone that has $1 more than me." ~ Everyone that has ever complained about rich people.

:#marseycapitalistmanlet: :#marseywagie:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.