Unable to load image

How were normal people poor ten years ago.

Outside of life events like fires, accidents, etc. How was a normal adult working a normal job unable to pay off their house or condo within ten years.

I'm legitimately baffled. I live in the midwest near a city. Housing prices have gone way up but they're still achievable. As in, if I work for 20 years I can't see how this won't be paid off. Which is how it was explained to me 10+ years ago. But there's a problem with that.

I make 40k a year and my job only required some time at a community college. 40k a year is not impressive. But the wages haven't kept up with the market. Even if I were only making 20k a decade ago, that's more than the price of an entire condo from back then.

Where did these peoples' money go. When I was growing up we knew a family that went on vacation 1-2 times a year. This was because "their house is fully paid off so they have more money to spend."

My whole life I kept thinking about how smart they must have been with their money. Motherlover, how was this not the default state of every mentally stable adult? I could outright buy a shitty 2 bedroom house (from ten years ago) in my hometown right now. I've only meaningfully saved for four years.

I've heard some excuses over the years but now that I have perspective they're all dumb.

>"The more money you have the more expensive life gets."

No it does not. Do you know how much I spent on groceries five years ago? A couple hundred. Do you know how much I spend on them now? A couple hundred + inflation. When you are making 80k a year you are not obligated to buy some r-slur subaru new off the lot every summer. You can keep buying normal used cars. You actually don't need to go to a steakhouse every weekend. That was a joke but I knew a family that went to rainforest cafe every weekend because "the kids like it." They LOST THEIR HOME, got hooked on coke, and died. Bi-weekly visits to gamestop and Toys R Us too.

>"I just like to spend on myself, so I have less savings."

What in all that is holy could you possibly be buying that eats up tens of thousands of dollars a year. Especially in current year. Literally what. I don't even have a guess. Am I naive and all my small town midwest neighbors are secretly crackheads?

>"We're being responsible and putting it into savings."

Oh okay good that's great why are you still working into your 60s and 70s again where the absolute frick did this money go.

>"Insurance, bills, blah blah blah."

What insurance policy do you have that eats up 10k a year. Are you just blasting your hose and space heaters 24/7? I used to take hour long showers almost daily. My water bill was not financially crippling. I heard this excuse so much that I was afraid to go to the doctor or dentist for years once I was on my own insurance. The job I have covers it. I pay $0 to have my teeth cleaned twice a year. I am not obese so I don't have crippling ailments.

>"Kids."

This one might be feasible but based on how much utter bullshit was behind literally every other excuse I've heard this also seems like it could be a stretch. Again, if the kid is not crippled in some way where could the money possibly be going. I easily spent less than 1k on myself over the past year for fun. You're telling me that you can't pick up some toys from a garage sale and maybe buy them a console/ bike every couple of years? How much do youth leagues cost for sports, $80 a season?

WHERE DID ALL OF THESE PEOPLES' MONEY GO???

This whole rant was made assuming someone lived in a single-income house and I just realized that it's even worse than I thought because all these families I'm remembering were dual income.

22
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The dual-incomes are just bad with money. The single-income poorcel is the one having a harder time.

It's about getting the initial down payment so the monthly mortgage is affordable and comparable to rent, so a neighbor doesn't go broke just to say "these walls and roof are mine".

On average, rent is 30% of take-home pay. Using your $40K example (lets pretend that's net, not gross), you take home $3,333 per month, and rent costs you $999 per month. That same monthly amount is a loan around $180K.

Does that go far where you live or will that get you a shack in ghettoville? Where I live, that would be a small overgrown plot of land with nothing on it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In my home town that'd be an old 1200-2000 sqft POS. But like ten years ago these same houses I'm looking at for under $180k were going for 30-50k. Modern day housing prices are unreasonable but growing up (more than ten years ago) I was always hearing moaning about financial woes. Idk what these people were doing.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They were spending beyond their means, a tale as old as time. I forget the term for it, "income creep" or something like that ... it's as you make more money, you start spending more money on frivolous things.

The smart thing to do is treat yourself every now and again, but otherwise live exactly the same way. Throw all that extra money into savings, which you can then invest, buy a home with, etc etc.

Instead, most people start going out to the bar more, going to restaurants or ordering delivery, buy higher-cost clothing or cars, things like that. They think "finally, I can reward myself" and instead of it being a one-off treat, they make it their new normal lifestyle.

15-20 years ago, people were doing that to such an extent - and were being encouraged to do so - that we got the whole bank/housing crash of 2007/2008.

Money went further back then though also, our economy is kinda fricked right now. I remember seeing starter homes in my area for $200-$300K 10 years ago, those same houses are now $700K-plus.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>rent costs 999

Avg for a 1br is like 1600, 1700 though, which is what kills single income people. It takes 33% and turned it into approx 50% of your take home

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I hear ya. That's why so many people have to either have roommates or live with a partner as a rentoid for so long ... it brings their own rent cost back down to 25-30% so then they can maybe start thinking about saving for the long term.

But depending on where they live, housing and general COL may be outpacing take-home wages. So by the time they're in a comfortable spot and ready to buy, they still can't.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I.e. boomercide must occur to liberate the young

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.