This is some Prot readings of Scripture invited by the lack of a coherent Magisterial authority but because it's at least a novel and humorous variant of I hadn't heard before. Please share more religious content with me in the future, friend.
Oh. It's 4 AM here so I didn't really think about where she might be getting it from.
Fun fact the Ethiopian Orthodox Christians consider Enoch canon and the Epistle of Jude (certainly) as well as the Epistle to the Hebrews (likely) make direct reference to it.
Intriguing. Maybe it was like fan fiction and folk were like thats interesting so referenced it or something. Like how movies sometimes reference other movies.
DickButtKiss
: Why do you rely on outside authority to tell you the validity of a particular Scripture?
A copy dating to around 200BC was located and carbon dated in the Dead Sea Scrolls, causing current scholarship to have shifted from a previous widely held theory that it was a reactionary Jewish text written in the era of the Maccabean Revolt pushing back against Greek influence to roughly what you're proposing (ancient fan fiction).
Interestingly, Enoch is completely absent from early Rabbinic Judaism's texts despite receiving frequent citations of mixed critical/accepting nature in the Christian tradition from figures like St. Irenaeus of Lyon, St. Justin Martyr, Origen, Tertullian and St. John Cassian. It was lost to the Western tradition entirely sometime in the late classical period and the last Byzantine references to it occurred in the 9th century. It wasn't until the 1700s that awareness outside of Ethiopia/Eritrea resurfaced. !historychads
and the Epistle of Jude (certainly) as well as the Epistle to the Hebrews (likely) make direct reference to it.
Both Catholics (Catholic Answers) and Protestants state that only because a text is mentioned in a canon book of the Bible, it does not automatically means that the mentioned text should be canon, by this logic, then the works of Greek philosophers such as Aratus' Phenomena should be canonized because Paul mentions it in Acts 17:28.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is some Prot readings of Scripture invited by the lack of a coherent Magisterial authority but because it's at least a novel and humorous variant of I hadn't heard before. Please share more religious content with me in the future, friend.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Its from the book of Enoch lol so schizo.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh. It's 4 AM here so I didn't really think about where she might be getting it from.
Fun fact the Ethiopian Orthodox Christians consider Enoch canon and the Epistle of Jude (certainly) as well as the Epistle to the Hebrews (likely) make direct reference to it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Intriguing. Maybe it was like fan fiction and folk were like thats interesting so referenced it or something. Like how movies sometimes reference other movies.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
A copy dating to around 200BC was located and carbon dated in the Dead Sea Scrolls, causing current scholarship to have shifted from a previous widely held theory that it was a reactionary Jewish text written in the era of the Maccabean Revolt pushing back against Greek influence to roughly what you're proposing (ancient fan fiction).
Interestingly, Enoch is completely absent from early Rabbinic Judaism's texts despite receiving frequent citations of mixed critical/accepting nature in the Christian tradition from figures like St. Irenaeus of Lyon, St. Justin Martyr, Origen, Tertullian and St. John Cassian. It was lost to the Western tradition entirely sometime in the late classical period and the last Byzantine references to it occurred in the 9th century. It wasn't until the 1700s that awareness outside of Ethiopia/Eritrea resurfaced. !historychads
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Both Catholics (Catholic Answers) and Protestants state that only because a text is mentioned in a canon book of the Bible, it does not automatically means that the mentioned text should be canon, by this logic, then the works of Greek philosophers such as Aratus' Phenomena should be canonized because Paul mentions it in Acts 17:28.
!christians !catholics
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
When did I say or imply that it should be canon? I was just sharing fun facts. I shared other fun facts with a historychads ping.
If it were canon I hopefully would've recognized where this lady was getting her from.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Acts 17:28
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context