Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Could the US even fight a world war under Democrats? Is there anything stopping all men from just pretending to be women so they can't be drafted?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's been tried, but the Army wasn't buying it.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17135466194624674.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Didn't the DoD explicitly state (somewhat recently) that they considered transwomen to be men for the purposes of the draft and selective service?

Basically "sure yeah we'll call you a woman but you still gotta go die"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Admitting this is all just pretend :marseyemojirofl:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The military would be r-slurred not to do what they did because if all it takes is declaring you're a train they'll lose 50% of moids out of the draft overnight lol.

The article had a funny bit further down about pooners not having to declare for the draft being problematic but the next sentence said they should not be required to do so regardless.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well ya but self selecting the crazy ones out of the gate (for the special missions)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When times get tough they will retvrn quick enough. Or just open the draft to women lol.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I remember when Ukraine popped off some guys dressed up as foids to leave the country and got caught and gender ppl were really quiet about it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The draft is immoral and a bad thing unless its hecking wholesome Ukraine

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh that's ok, you don't have to get drafted- we need lots of workers building munitions, here we'll even provide housing and chain you to the assembly line so you won't get lost!

Dinner? Hmmm not seeing that on the schedule, I'll get back to you

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If it's a world war the Military will become very woke and strike a great blow for gender equality by expanding the draft to all adults. It's ok, you can wear the anime girl skirt over your 1970s flak jacket- now get in the fricking Humvee, the entrenched Chinese marines won't reveal their firing positions all by themselves

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They'll just change the rules to take anyone with a Y chromosome.

If you've got a Y, it's time to die :marseypatriot:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The final regulation unravels a Trump-era system for handling sexual assault complaints, discarding some of the rules that bolstered due process rights of the accused. Supporters said those rules were critical to ensuring that students had the opportunity to defend themselves; critics said they discouraged sexual assault survivors from reporting incidents and turned colleges into quasi-courtrooms.

>Removing due process for defendants.

>Due Process turned college campuses into quasi-courtrooms instead of a kangaroo tribunal. This was a bad thing.

:marseyconfused2:

Not trying to go out in a limb and defend male feminists here but acting like the removal of due process is actually a good thing does seem par the course for current year journ*lism.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I had a friend who got Title IX'd by a BPD ex gf. Luckily this marijuana-enjoying failson had very rich parents who probably tossed 200K to frightening lawyers and eventually the school dropped it after enough legal threats convinced them that the kangaroo court proceedings were based on false allegations, but he would have be annihilated if he didn't.

Oh well, believe all women I guess this was the only time someone abused Title IX :#marseyclueless:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>kangaroo court

Under the Trump administration's regulation, finalized in 2020, colleges were required to stage live hearings to adjudicate complaints, where the accused could cross-examine witnesses — including the students who were alleging assault.

Under President Biden's new rules, colleges will have more flexibility. The investigator or person adjudicating the case may question witnesses in separate meetings or employ a live hearing.

The new rules also will allow schools to use a lower bar for adjudicating guilt. In weighing evidence, they are now directed to use a “preponderance of the evidence” standard, though they may opt for a higher standard of “clear and convincing evidence” if they use that standard in other similar proceedings. Under the Trump version, universities had a choice, but they were required to use the higher standard if they did so in other settings.

Make all the laws arbitrary! :marseyfluffy:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Can !burgers explain how this works? I thought laws had to be done through Congress? Can the president just change this title anytime he feels like it?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Kinda, yeah. They are called executive orders and are basically a system formed because Congress didn't want to actually pass laws sometimes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Title IX prohibits schools from receiving federal funding if they discriminate based on s*x. Congress directed each agency administering those programs to make regulations that govern how schools apply, show their compliance with the law, and can be terminated if they're found not to comply. The President has this power (and obligation) because Congress gave it to him—though to some extent, interpreting what the law means is a necessary part of executing any law.

Even though regulations have to be based on the law that Congress passed to be valid, the courts have long given a lot of deference to agency interpretations of the law, so it's rare for them to be struck down for that reason. Changing this standard is a pet project for groups like the Federalist Society.

Can the president just change this title anytime he feels like it?

There are legal procedures he has to follow for regulations to be valid (and this generates a lot of lawsuits, sometimes with the aim of delaying implementation until after the election), but in the end yes, it's pretty much the President's choice.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wasn't there a supreme court case about this recently? What happened to that?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Seems pretty crazy that Congress let's the president update the rules instead. Especially if this title is so important.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The President can issue orders to the Executive Branch on enforcing legislation. If either the Legislative or Judicial branch declare that the President has acted out of order, they can check and balance him.

Essentially the President can roll the dice if he thinks he can get away with stuff.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

sexual harassment

:marseyhmm: by the :!marseytrain:s right? who is sexually harassing coomer degen :!marseytrain:s?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

that's their fantasy :marseybdtf:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

exactly, they want that sweet SH

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseysmughips:

Sweaty. Do you not read all the stories transwomen regale us with about men whistling and yelling at them on the streets? This both give the transwomen a massive gender euphoria and terrifies them enough to teehee tell the Internet about it.

Those men were 100% sexually harassing every last one of them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

One of my favourite Brianna Wu stories was printed in a newspaper, possibly even The Boston Globe, as she ran in the Democratic primary for Massachusetts.

Conveniently having coming back from a run after the reporter had arrived, he said that he'd had his earbuds in as he ran past a building site when he could tell the workers were yelling at him. But when he stopped to hear what they were catcalling him with, they were instead telling him they were going to vote for him.

That story is absolute perfection, so dense and layered, and even with a twist ending. Other :!marseytrain:s just get catcalls from the visually impaired, but Brianna Wu gets recognised by local Democrat-voting construction workers who can spot a primary candidate from twelve floors up.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The final regulation also includes provisions barring discrimination based on pregnancy, including childbirth, abortion and lactation. For instance, schools must accommodate students' need to attend medical appointments, as well as provide students and workers who are nursing a clean, private space to pump milk.

I don't even necessarily disagree with this aspect, but it is amusing to me how often simply not providing something for free counts as "discrimination". Like the lactation room thing. It's not like they're providing private rooms to men and not women or anything - just not providing them at all somehow counts as "discrimination".

I really feel like that word has lost all meaning.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

not giving special treatment is discrimination

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They can pump at their desks so I can ogle their milkers. :arousedpizzashill:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's a tenet of the Democratic religion that something is discrimination if it affects one group more than another (a "disparate impact"), and therefore, equal treatment is often discriminatory.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Democracy Dies in Darkness

>LOL

Biden Title IX rules set to protect trans students, abuse survivors

The administration's regulations offer protections for transgender students, but do not address athletics

By Laura Meckler

April 19, 2024 at 5:00 a.m. EDT

The Biden administration on Friday finalized sweeping new rules barring schools from discriminating against transgender students and ordering significant changes for how schools adjudicate claims of sexual harassment and assault on campus.

The provisions regarding gender identity are the most politically fraught, setting up an election-year culture clash with conservative states and school boards that have limited transgender rights in schools, banned discussion of gender identity in classrooms and removed books with LGBTQ+ themes. Mindful of the politics, the administration is delaying action on the contentious issue of whether transgender girls and women should be allowed to compete in women's and girls' sports.

The long-awaited regulation represents the administration's interpretation of Title IX, a 1972 law that bars s*x discrimination in schools that receive federal funding. Title IX is best known for ushering in equal treatment for women in sports, but it also governs how schools handle complaints of sexual harassment and assault, a huge issue on many college campuses.

Now the Biden administration is deploying the regulation to formalize its long-standing view that s*x discrimination includes discrimination based on gender identity as well as sexual orientation, a direct challenge to conservative policies across the country.

Ten states, for instance, require transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms that align with their biological s*x identified at birth, according to tracking by the Movement Advancement Project. Some school districts will not use the pronouns corresponding with a trans student's gender identity. Both situations might constitute violations of Title IX under the new regulation. In addition, if a school failed to properly address bullying based on gender identity or sexual orientation, that, too, could be a violation of federal law.

“No one should face bullying or discrimination just because of who they are or who they love. Sadly, this happens all too often,” Education Secretary Miguel Cardona told reporters in a conference call.

The Education Department's Office for Civil Rights investigates allegations of s*x discrimination, among other things, and schools that fail to come into compliance risk losing federal funding. A senior administration official said that the office could investigate cases where schools were potentially discriminating, even if they were following their own state's law.

The final regulation also includes provisions barring discrimination based on pregnancy, including childbirth, abortion and lactation. For instance, schools must accommodate students' need to attend medical appointments, as well as provide students and workers who are nursing a clean, private space to pump milk.

The combination of these two issues — sexual assault and transgender rights — drew enormous public interest, with some 240,000 public comments submitted in response to the proposed version published in 2022. The new rules take effect Aug. 1, in time for the start of next school year.

The final regulation unravels a Trump-era system for handling sexual assault complaints, discarding some of the rules that bolstered due process rights of the accused. Supporters said those rules were critical to ensuring that students had the opportunity to defend themselves; critics said they discouraged sexual assault survivors from reporting incidents and turned colleges into quasi-courtrooms.

Education Department officials said they had retained the elements that made sense but created a better overall framework that gave equal treatment and balanced the rights of all involved. “A fair process will help ensure that investigations lead to accurate, reliable and effective resolution of s*x discrimination complaints,” Cardona said.

Under the Trump administration's regulation, finalized in 2020, colleges were required to stage live hearings to adjudicate complaints, where the accused could cross-examine witnesses — including the students who were alleging assault. Supporters said that live hearings were critical to ascertaining what actually happened when facts are contested, but others argued cross-examination could retraumatize assault survivors.

Under the new Biden rules, colleges will have more flexibility. The investigator or person adjudicating the case may question witnesses in separate meetings or employ a live hearing.

The new rules also will allow schools to use a lower bar for adjudicating guilt. In weighing evidence, they are now directed to use a “preponderance of the evidence” standard, though they may opt for a higher standard of “clear and convincing evidence” if they use that standard in other similar proceedings. Under the Trump version, universities had a choice, but they were required to use the higher standard if they did so in other settings.

The proposal also expands the definition of what constitutes sexual harassment, discarding a narrower definition used under President Donald Trump, and broadens who on campus has a responsibility to respond to allegations.

Some of the Trump provisions were retained. Schools, for instance, will continue to have the option to use informal resolution of discrimination complaints, unless the allegation involves an employee of a K-12 school.

The Biden administration's approach was welcomed by advocates for sexual assault survivors.

The rules “will make schools safer and more accessible for young people, many of whom experienced irreparable harm while they fought for protection and support,” said Emma Grasso Levine, senior manager of Title IX policy and programs at Know Your IX, a project of the advocacy group Advocates for Youth.

“Now, it's up to school administrators to act quickly to implement and enforce” the new rules, she added.

Sexual assault has been a serious issue on college campuses for years, and in releasing the regulation, the Biden administration said the rates were still “unacceptably high.”

But the most controversial element of the regulation involves the rights of transgender students, and it came under immediate fire.

Administration officials point to a 2020 Supreme Court ruling that s*x discrimination in employment includes gender identity and sexual orientation to bolster their interpretation of the law. But conservatives contend that Title IX does not include these elements and argue that accommodations for transgender students can create situations that put other students at risk. They object, for instance, to having a transgender woman — someone they refer to as a “biological man” — using women's bathrooms or locker rooms.

Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.), chairwoman of the House Education Committee, called the regulation an escalation of Democrats' “contemptuous culture war that aims to radically redefine s*x and gender.” The department, she said, has put decades of advancement for women and girls “squarely on the chopping block.”

Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) speaks with other House Republicans about the passage of the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act on April 20, 2023, in Washington. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)

“Evidently, the acceptance of biological reality, and the faithful implementation of the law, are just pills too big for the Department to swallow — and it shows,” she said in a statement.

Still, the administration sidestepped the contentious issue of athletics, at least for now. A separate regulation governing how and when schools may exclude transgender students from women and girls teams remains under review, and administration officials offered no timetable for when it would be finalized. People familiar with their thinking said it was being delayed to avoid injecting the matter into the presidential campaign, where President Biden faces a close race against Trump.

Share this article

Share

A senior administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity in a briefing with reporters Thursday, declined to comment on the politics of this decision but noted that the athletics rule was proposed after the main Title IX regulation.

Polling shows that clear majorities of Americans, including a sizable slice of Democrats, oppose allowing transgender athletes to compete on girls' and women's teams. Twenty-five states have statewide bans on their participation.

The proposed sports regulation disallows these statewide, blanket bans, but it allows school districts to restrict participation more narrowly defined — for instance on competitive high school or college teams. The main Title IX regulation does not address the issue, and an administration official said the status quo would remain. Still, some have argued that the new general ban on discrimination could apply to sports even though the administration does not intend it to.

The rules governing how campuses deal with harassment complaints have changed repeatedly in recent years.

The Obama administration issued detailed guidance in 2014 for schools in handling complaints, but that was later tossed out by Trump Education Secretary Betsy DeVos. Her department went through its own laborious rulemaki

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao delaying action on athletics. Don't want to turn off the moderate suburban vote before the election.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wow, you must be a JP fan.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I Hope trump wins and enacts TTD

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Are you gonna vote for him bb?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

sure

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river."

Snapshots:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2024/04/19/titleix-biden-transgender-sexual-assault/:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.