The gender of peace has logged on

You aren't choosing bears over men, you are pretending to in a hypothetical where there are no real stakes involved for you because it lets you play the victim. Men should not tolerate women's weaponised victimhood, and you are engaging in this even as you claim that women don't do this. "You sound like an incel" "you want to control me" "this makes me wary".

I'm not weaponizing my victim hood. Rather I'm pointing out how your very rhetoric, which itself is both controlling AND victimized, makes you sound like someone to avoid, not be trusted etc. In other words ... creepy af. "Normal" men (as in emotionally well adjusted, rational, well socialized men who know women, are comfortable with them etc etc) tend not to sound like you are here. But it's reddit and I'm the fool for engaging with a control freak who has some truly bizarre ideas about women and how to "manage" them. In the future I'll be more wary.

This entire comment is weaponised victimhood. You say my rhetoric is dangerous, you project your own expectation of control onto my setting of boundaries, your own self victimisation onto my refusal to take an insult sitting down, you act as if I'm demanding to be trusted, which I'm not, but it helps your argument to pretend that I'm some sort of a threat to you, and then you tell me how I'm supposed to behave which naturally means being a doormat.

You're asking that women be controlled. Sounds creepy to me...

The problem is that women are very good at manifesting their collective delusions into legislature and preferential treatment. 13/55 posting will power their next round of funding for women-only places paid for by landlord tax-dollars while also being used as an argument for more affirmative action to offset just another one of their oppressive forces.

Just imagine DEI landlords, nothing would get fixed anymore. Or evenworse, renthog single mother quotas.