https://thehill.com/policy/defense/564423-senate-panel-votes-to-make-women-register-for-draft/
Reported by:
- TedKaczynski : July 22nd, 2021
Us senate to expand draft to women
- 21
- 20
Top Poster of the Day:
Spiderman
Current Registered Users: 26,257
| C-SPAN: | Standby for additional updates... |
/h/pol LOG /h/pol MODS /h/pol EXILEES /h/pol FOLLOWERS /h/pol BLOCKERS
Live commit: 3126db2
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
When WW3 im gonna be a conciencsious objector, not because Im a kitty, butt because I think womxn should be leading the way on the front lines!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
lmao i fully support this because it will finally put an end to any delusional notion that men and women can do the same things equally as well ahhahahahahahahahaa
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We already know that, as has been demonstrated by all military fitness tests
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And the murder rate
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Femoids mog in that but only against defenseless clumps of cells
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
*they all pass the fitness tests though (?)
after the tests were watered down*
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Lol. The army's been lowering standards for women soldiers from the moment they were allowed in.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i'm well aware of that. what i'm saying is when there's a full on war, a real one like WWII, it will become wildly apparent how stupid it is to put foids in combat roles
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I would argue it already is. But to your point ain't nothing like a stack of bodies to make people change their minds.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
... then why are they still doing it?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Probably desperate for recruitment. Also very very few chicks are in any direct combat rolls so no stacks of bodies to go around.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I'm against it simply because women can't do front line combat jobs and that's what we draft for. All this will do is fill support roles with underqualified women instead of overqualified men avoiding the draft.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
cant we at least have them dig ditches and clean the mess halls?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
a sweaty woman flailing uselessly with a shovel trying to dig in hard dry clay is hot
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
We hire thirdies to do that. Don't take Sal's job
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm looking forward to being educated on why this uniquely oppresses women
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
"Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river."
Snapshots:
https://thehill.com/policy/defense/564423-senate-panel-votes-to-make-women-register-for-draft/:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context