This is missing important context chud :soysnootypefast:

:mjlol: they're not denying it !nooticers

82
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So the argument is that it wasn't an affair and not a denial that it was a career advancement move. Ok lol.

:marseyhmm:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's the Snopes strategy of avoiding saying an embarrassing claim is true by adding a random falsehood to the true claim and then debunking it. Tried and tested.

tbh though getting with someone who is separated is really not scandalous. What's next, shaming someone for dating a divorcee?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Only works one way though.

Claim : Trump wants to used Project 2025 to install a fascist Christian dictatorship.

The Facts : Trump once shook hands with a member of the Heritage Foundation. Therefore, he explicitly endorses all of their policies and is a bad, bad, bad man.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Correction: he is a bad, bad, bad , orange man

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Whats bad about project 2025 anyway? Plus we should allow everyone into our Christian nation whether they be lutheran or catholic or eastern orthodox

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The sacred union of marriage remains until God parts them

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Factcheck: it was still adultery

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.