having a nuanced
discussion about 
getting rekt by pooner
https://old.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/1gbvecv/trans_man_shuts_down_ben_shapiro_with_a_slam_dunk/
Most of the comments are complaining about youtube comments being too chuddy 
/not agreeing with them that the pooner is a genius and ben shapiro got completely stumped
here's a link to the full video
https://rdrama.net/h/chudrama/post/310860/-
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
These fricking idiots think constantly interrupting someone is a slam dunk. As if not permitting them to answer your loaded question is somehow equivalent to being unable to answer it. Actually, it's hard to even call anything she's saying a loaded question because it's just a bunch of disjoined ranting interspersed with stupid rhetorical questions.
She knows the hardcore pro-life people don't care how you identify when it comes to not killing babies. She knows that pro-life people don't think "freedom" includes the freedom to kill babies. She knows that a crime leading to the baby being created doesn't invalidate that for the pro-life people killing the baby would just be another crime. etc.
I sat through 4 minutes of this pooner having a meltdown and I want my time back. The original question was about defending Harris' specific abortion stance (presumably meaning late term elective abortions) and it turns into her rambling about how diversity created smart phones. She finally ends it by pretending to shake hands with Ben and then... NOT DOING IT!!!! Wowzer. Gottem.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Just the last 10 seconds is a
Yeah and the court found him not guilty, something being in a court record has zero bearing on its validity
This non-argument makes me
Some
writing that on 
does't make it significant in any way shape or form
Every single person in this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_iPhone is a bald white guy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yea, anyone can theoretically sound good when they have a rehearsed speech laying out all their arguments and refusing to allow a rebuttal to take place. But this idiot doesn't even sound good superficially. Someone was accused of something... in court documents?? Are you unaware that the court documents in question are are just the filings of an adversarial citizen that is allowed to allege literally anything? Are you unaware that the response from the accused would also be court documents where the same accusation is denied?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I hate to invoke
fallacies 
but this is textbook Gish gallop 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't follow you. Maybe you're just spoofing what they would say in response. But I'm agreeing with you that the 'guy' Shapiro is talking to is fundamentally misunderstanding the significance of 'court documents' when they just mean allegations against Trump that someone submitted to the court.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context