I saw that today too. That sub is barely "science"/natural science. This is what redditors think science is all about. Their whole sub is sociology shit.
Ignoring the field of the 'study' and what I think science stands for these redditors don't seem to care about the principles of science either. Rather than criticizing its content or methodology they're crying over the group that did it. (and therefore it's heckin invalid and bullshit and shouldn't be allowed in my science subreddit ). Which is a conflict of interest but again nothing about the study itself is being criticized.
cant even when they discover 90% of Taiwan's people arent 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I saw that today too. That sub is barely "science"/natural science. This is what redditors think science is all about. Their whole sub is sociology
shit.
Ignoring the field of the 'study' and what I think science stands for these redditors don't seem to care about the principles of science either. Rather than criticizing its content or methodology they're crying over the group that did it. (and therefore it's heckin invalid and bullshit and shouldn't be allowed in my science subreddit
). Which is a conflict of interest but again nothing about the study itself is being criticized.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context