Like if you took the 4chan community and had them give you group answers about foid behaviors and thought processes they can get you the correct answer to a T that perfectly matches every single time out in the wild.
However, these same channers, even the fit or competent ones, are terrible at wooing or attracting foids in real life.
So like, what's up with that?
Is it because one part of mating success is always going to be ones inability to read people perfectly?
Or is it that foids are hyper successful at detecting even the weakest signs of autism and rejecting them?
And if it's number two. Then is it correct to say that foids are by design anti development as they instinctually hold genius autists in disdain?
Explain stuff.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The coach is worse than the pro-player at actually playing, but might have a deeper theoretical understanding. It's drills that he's missing, but most of all physical attributes like height in the case of basketball, fighting or wooing women that the scholar might miss and no amount of skill can replace.
A good example might be a biologist who understands mating dances of emus. He understands them far better then them but probably can't woo one.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Actually in the case of birds you could probably woo one by copying the mating dances.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/style/wp/2018/07/23/feature/the-crane-who-fell-in-love-with-a-human/
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Probably
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context