Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16936581662800317.webp

:marseyschizotwitch:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16936581663274963.webp

she disagreed with me... guess I'll have to unsubscribe... :punchjak:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16936581664301255.webp

let me give you my highly valuable opinion... read peepeeshott...

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16936581664977891.webp

:marseylaptopangry2:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16936581665689998.webp

:soycrygenocide: :marseyunlessgenocide: NO THE ECOOOSYSTEMS AHHHHH SAVE ME LORAXMAN

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1693658561272722.webp

I did not watch the video, and yet I am mad. :marseyindignant:

This is all r-slurs posting within 30 minutes of the upload, which I find funny

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16936581666163144.webp

because you get automatons cracking their knuckles and writing shit like this

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16936581666543941.webp

within seconds of seeing his sleeper agent trigger word in the title of the video :marseyxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I see this lady's videos on my YouTube front page from time to time, but they all just seem like click-bait with titles like "I don't believe in free will" or something so I never watch them.

I guess she's at least kind of smart though, knows how to stir up drama. That's more productive than most physics majors.

:#marseyagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Fount it

If it's this bad in particle physics, imagine how totally fraudulent other, softer 'sciences' are

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

she's definitely got some other good dramatic videos

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Bitches about she not being an expert in the field, therefore her opinion is stupid

>Proceeds to quote Einstein on some pro-socialist comment he once made

Same people.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16936678736850233.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!commies

Anti-revolutionary rhetoric about to be dispersed, get in here.

:#marseystalin:


:#marseydisintegrate: :!#marseyflamewar::space::!marseyagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!neolibs, this commie pig is summoning reinforcements! Don't let him!

:#marseycapitalistmanlet:


:#marseydisintegrate: :!#marseyflamewar::space::!marseyagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the :marseyflaggermany: are getting uppity again

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Aligning incentives of greed is more effective than state planning and will remain so at least until near-omniscient via panopticon AGI.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah so she believes in Superdeterminism (i.e. everything and I fricking mean everything was pre-planned, no it isn't presbyterianism for some reason) as a way to get around Bell's Theorem.

Other than that she has okay viedos. Kinda deep into “SCIENCE FTW” type shit

I like how the internet demonstrates that the most neurodivergent 5% of people will immediately leave 90% of responses lest you somehow disagree with their worldvies.

Cute twinks never consider that both models could work within reason, as there's more than one way to skin a cat.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"pre-planned" presupposes a god that can make plans. determinism doesn't. I dunno what "super"-determinism is supposed to be (how can anything be more deterministic than deterministic?) but a god that has agency would contradict it. so no, it's not presbytarianism at all.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyautism:

Did your mom cry when the doctor gave her the diagnosis?

Superdeterminism the the name of a set of theories which don't explain quantum mechanics, they just fricking reproduce them. They attempt to explain the measurement problem and the non-locality of quantum mechanics by saying literally every event to include the observations of quantum coherence was pre-planned before time began.

John Bell said:

“Suppose the world is super-deterministic, with not just inanimate nature running on behind-the-scenes clockwork, but with our behavior, including our belief that we are free to choose to do one experiment rather than another, absolutely predetermined, including the "decision" by the experimenter to carry out one set of measurements rather than another, the difficulty disappears.”

It's about as plausible as a giant spider weaving the future of the universe into a giant gay web

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

just because something is counter-intuitive doesn't mean it's untrue.

It's about as plausible as a giant spider weaving the future of the universe into a giant gay w

no, it's about as plausible as the waves patterns on the ocean.

you're confusing unpredictability (which is perfectly consistent with determinism) with the quasi-religious version of free will (that is unfalsifiable, but would contradict determinism if it existed).

but you're definitely too r-slurred to be having an opinion on this topic. Start by reading some of Dennett's stuff on compatibilism, e.g. Elbow Room or Kinds of Minds, or Quining Qualia.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I need you to read closely—I'm not talking about philosophy.

Superdeterminism and determinism are not the same thing. It is a situation in which the universe actively fricks our ability to study it because our ability to choose whatever experiments are linked causally to the results, therefore making everything predetermined, this isn't a regular feature of a deterministic world.

Superdeterminism was a term invented by John Bell as an idea to explain quantum non-locality and what I'm talking about doesn't have much to do with arguments for or against free-will which is hard to even define in a logical manner, superdeterminism is a giant non-local hidden variable system that controls everything, even to the point of predestination of the experimenters' measurements.

Bell's theorem shows that standard quantum mechanics is not consistent with local realism, a very general principle that was not originally thought to make any testable experimental predictions. You can have realism or locality but not both.

Bell's achievement was that he showed that Bell's inequality is implied by local realism, while standard quantum mechanical predictions violate it. Experiments have since shown that Bell's inequalities are violated in reality, and refute local realism, consistent with quantum mechanics.

If you want to use the superdeterminism loophole, (and why it's called superdeterminism, as opposed to whatever cute twink philosophers call it) you need to assume that there are determined rules which tell things in superposition how to behave, and further, there is some mechanism that ties the things in superposition to the choice of the experimenter and experimental tools of the direction to measure, so that the direction one chooses to measure is also somehow determined.

This is pretty ridiculous, we could program a computer to run random number generator, and set polarizers according to the outcome. Then whichever random number generator we decided to use, the result must be correlated in the exact same way with the universal master plan.

It doesn't matter if we Introduce variables, if we rewire the experiment, if we change all the settings to correspond in a different fashion. The nature of the universal plan is so broad that it requires an intelligent agency which knows exactly what we are doing.

All of this is not empirically testable, btw. So for you bring up Dennett is pretty funny, because superdeterminism is a matter

of belief, as well—usually because guys like ‘t Hooft like the math and will contort themselves into loops to justify it. Peak autism.

Superdetermism means that science doesn't even fricking work.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not a huge fan of the idea, but it's less absurd than you're making it out to be. And strongly held beliefs that we possess at least some limited type of free will are central to all arguments against it.

Superdeterminism and determinism are not the same thing.

Superdeterminism is just "determinism, but it even applies to everything!" (including stuff that in the view of a person using the word "superdeterminism" "should" be excluded from "normal determinism"). But that's just determinism.

Superdetermi[ni]sm means that science doesn't even fricking work.

That's the view of some people (e.g. Zeilinger and you). I disagree.

The nature of the universal plan is so broad that it requires an intelligent agency which knows exactly what we are doing.

I don't think that's necessary at all.

All of this is not empirically testable, btw.

So? Lots of things aren't empirically testable.

Is the (whole) universe finite or infinite, spherical, flat, hyperbolic,...? We'll never know for sure. (We can find a lower bound for it's volume (if it were spherical), and with better measurement tools that lower bound will increase, but it won't increase to infinity).

So for you bring up Dennett is pretty funny,

You should really read some of Dennett's stuff on free will and consciousness, if you think that's out of character.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1691152552869678.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Most sexually attractive kraut foid

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think she is a sleeper drama queen from some of the other takes I've heard from her

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thatcher was right all along, every climate activist is a nutty communist

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseywatermelon:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

fight each other blindly about things they have zero grasp of

Sounds like a day ending in "y" on rDrama dot net.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

fuk u I am pro coomer and phd in coomerology, I have huge grasp :marseywink: on the subject

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Uh not all days end in Y!

:#soyjakanimeglasses:

(In Spanish)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyeff:

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.