Only about ~1% of Wikipedia's funding goes towards their hostings :marseyderp:

157
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Have you guys tried denying a donation on the gibs request and telling them it's because of woke? A dude I know did a few years ago and then got an automated mail by one the higher-ups with 300 links showing how wikipedia is ackshually totes unbiased. Guy replied again, saying something to the effect of "lmao ok buddy sure" and then got a few mails from the guy himself malding.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

and then rational wiki and conservapedia clapped

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Share them

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not doxing the dude, it was just some funny malding about how they're always neutral and shit like that. I'm told he gave up after a couple of emails.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just use a black box to censor your name and adress lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lmao, it's my friend from Canada you wouldn't know him. I think it's easily partially replicable, I've told this story online before and I know people tried it and at least got the fricking "blah blah blah it's the fricking users cause wikimedia is fricking always neutral" automated mail.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

you can just keep yourself safe if you're gonna get doxxed from this, dont worry

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

holy shit bro delete these comments and make an alt then

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

cuz then we get to read the response from wiki

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh it's just some guy malding a fricking bit, you can tell he's slightly pissed about it but nothing much.

Edit: it's not from jim wales, it's some other dude.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That sounds funny.

Please share more

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not much more to share, it's just funny someone actually reads your input. The dude used an address associated with a former "big-ish" donor, bigshot guy might have read it because of that.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Brb replying “cause you love blacks” from [email protected]

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Their believe good faith priniciple in ediiting is beyond crazy. Sure im to believe this guy who has been edit warring every yikes person for the last 10 years is totally acting in good faith. Just suspense

all priors, logic and sense of self and totally works.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How is Wikipedia supposed to be “woke”?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Would it be so easy to make it Wokepedia if it wasn't? :marsey57:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.giphy.com/media/pGP4c8488ioAp9phUa/giphy.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1694996941593865.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hmm, maybe I'll try it :marseythinkorino:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.