NYT says no more "orange man bad"

it's fun that they know what that is

158
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Have they considered orange man very bad. Or perhaps even orange man very very bad.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Maybe they could mix it up:

Bad Orange :marseycitrusshrug: Man: Bad Bad Bad

Who's Bad? Orange :marseyflamepoint: Man!

Man of Orange= Bad

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Call Dr. Seuss.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Man of Orange

This might insult the Dutch royal family.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think :marseynooticeglow: there :marseycheerup: was a Rutger Hauer movie :marseyinboots: called Soldier :marseykaiser: of Orange.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah made by Verhoeven before he came to America. I wanted to watch it years ago but couldn't find it anywhere.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

MOO rights now, BIPOX

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If they just tried "orange man cuck" or "orange man cute twink" they could win. But they'd rather lose than use no no words.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Return to classics: orange man doubleplus ungood.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Orange man worst

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Leftoids have been struggling to come up with something worse than "Nazi" to call rightoids for a while but nothing has caught on. "Demonic" has religious overtones (bad) and "ontologically evil" just isn't catchy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.