Please do let me know, feedback my favourite, always helps me improve my work !

Every firefighter I've ever met has been fat, lazy, and worst of all, yt.

There are like two actual proper fires a month in the city I live in (2,000,000 + population) - the rest of the 'fires' would probably end just as quickly by letting them burn out on their own. So what are all firefighters doing the rest of the year? Fingering each other's asses and collecting government salaries. If you disagree with me I'll give you an hour to think of one solid example of a firefighter improving your life, i'll wait.

Anybody whose house burns down is a fricking r-slur and deserves it, they probably left their stupid scented candles next to a curtain. I'd rather let my house burn down then give any unearned heroics to a so-called firefighter.

before everybody goes at me - i realise most firefighters are volunteers, but that's actually worse. you want credit for not being paid to do nothing? that's called having a hobby frickwad, nobody gives medal to a bunch of fat losers who sit around in a school gym playing MTG and thats essentially all volunteer 'firefighters' are doing

if you know any firefighters I guarantee you they are secretly abusing their families

if any firefighters are reading this: i didn't ask for your help and i won't be giving you any credit for doing your job (or your hobby as it were). i know for sure that most of the fires i've ever seen have been deliberately started by fire'fighters' to get more attention. eat my butt and drink my melted shit, get a better job, leave your family alone

!neolibs

Social change is built upon the backbone of technological change and societal development. When social change grows at rates beyond that of societal innovation and technological growth, society collapses due to not having the adequate systems to accommodate social changes resulting in increasing social complexity without economic gains.

It is far more likely that the reason societies led by women have not existed historically in most of the world throughout human history is because those societies in the majority of cases simply could not compete successfully against male led systems.

All eras of human history have the best society of the time in terms of capabilities thriving. One might argue that societies with the largest size/ too big to fail were the ones that thrived, but reaching that size itself would have required the capabilities above and beyond everybody else to hold those lands and resources and innovate upon them.

Ants are a more advanced species than humans from a biological perspective. Ants create a completely ant friendly local environment to work from meanwhile humans have nowhere near similar control over their local environment. The closest humans have come to creating localized human environments are cities where everybody is a human or a human approved animal, and even these cities often end up with pests such as rats, along with being population sinks unlike ant colonies.

Humans have still not evolved to thrive in human created environments and what we call an improvement in quality of life is just humans creating a large human friendly colony moving ever closer to the quality of control an ant colony has within.

Human societies are analogous to ant colonies and we have failed to conduct war on one another simply due to nobody having a 100% effective deterrence against nuclear weapons. The moment such a deterrent is achieved global warfare should open up again.

Taking all the resources and the people as labor is always going to be a better deal than just taking the resources.

Taking all the resources is always going to be a better deal than taking all the people.

Once human immigration in flows stop for developed economies war is back on the menu. We have already seen this in the case of war breaking out between Russia and Ukraine. This is the century of war for human resources to continually expand the size of ones society. Those not participating are already dead on the water.

The US is already the winner and Canada is taking the risk of oversupplying itself and that itself should be concerning as it suggests they don't think they will be able to get as many people down the line.

Automation solves the issues on the supply side of economics, automation does not solve all the problems on the demand side of economics, such as who is the consumer.

The wars we are likely to face ahead are the manpower wars, the culture wars, the religious wars, and the ideological wars. Military warfare would remain limited to strategic locations across the world.

East Asia is a failed system. East Asia fertility rate is already so low that it has to be combined with the fertility rate of the Pacific Islands to reduce panic.

Globalization has basically created eugenics on steroids where all the lesser performing civilizations are dying out as women become a global commodity.

We can trust that 10% of the lower half of the population will absolutely die out per generation.

There is no true solution to this. Just as the blood cells in our body might think they are independent, we are in the same way like the cells within a society.

We are all born into bigger structures than us that we are unable to escape.

As of now the biggest ideological battle is taking place between the more extreme variants of Islam and the western world. The Western world already succeeded in defeating ISIS. Failed to defeat Taliban, and is now on its way to destroy HAMAS and Hezbollah. Which leaves the Taliban as the only Islamic background threat to the west outside of the west. Once all Islamic world proxies are destroyed, it places the middle east on a path of further moderation of its cultural values, speeding up the process of conforming with western values over time.

The west exists as the major power till the Border of Russia.

The west exists till the borders of Sudan.

The west exists till the borders of Colombia.

The west is currently made up of 80 nation states.

The global arab population will be westernized to 21st century standards by 2060.

Every layer of extremists killed has over time resulted in worse quality extremists and weaker extremists. At current rates they should be out of arab extremists to fight the west in another 10-30 years.

We are going to have continental scale unions before we are going to have large scale space colonies. It makes sense as it is easier to globalize the movement of all humans and trade than it is to move large groups of people out to space.

The first wave attempts at transhumanism failed. The trans movement crashed and burned. There will come a new wave of transhumanism 20-30 years down the line.

China is going to fall under the US sphere of influence. When it cannot grow any further it will have no choice but to integrate further with the US economy as a secondary partner.

The primary challenge for the US is to develop a higher layer of economy that cannot be reached by China. AI, rockets, and bio technology are those industries.

China has simply risen up to fill in the gap in technological innovation and research left by the stagnation of the European research industry. China itself will be replaced by India when it comes to research as no other country will have the numbers in population or willing obedient workforce to push out as many research papers to feed the machine.

There are four more layers of globalization remaining. The current layer is the integration of China to the west. The next layer will be the integration of India and the entirety of Asia to the west. The third layer will be integration of the entirety of South America to the west, and the final layer will be the complete integration of Africa to the west.

Currently globalization can be best tracked on a per capita basis. The higher your GDP per capita the more connected to global systems your country is.

We can safely take the cutoff for west aligned nation states to be any country with a GDP per capita over 15,000 USD. As of now 33% of the world is well integrated into western global systems to the point of complete collapse if the west and the economic systems they developed were to fail.

All civilizations stagnate at some point. Reaching the peak of their ideas at which point they either evolve further or die out as others overtake them.

The problem is that no country is in a position this century to overtake the US, nor is likely to be in a position to overtake the US in the next. This means when the US stops improving the world stops improving.

Global economy is very robust and was able to adjust to the shock of the Russia-Ukraine war within years. The weak point of Europe is Germany which lost all fighting spirit after losing WW2. It has never been the same since.

The EU is well on its way to further integration as all leaders involved realize that the system in its current form is too weak as individual entities grouping together without a single head to rule it.

East Asia is one of the major tech regions of the world. When East Asia fails completely, only the US and the EU would remain in the tech race.

Israel has pretty much wiped out HAMAS in gaza.

Israel is going to wipe out hezbollah similarly.

Not a single society alive today is capable of flourishing in the long run. We need another age of enlightenment.

Global population declines by 25% per generation. That's best case scenario. Almost nobody wants more than 2 kids.

to be continued...

can't wait to rent a gf

!zoomers

I watched a couple minutes 2x speed to find this hagmaxxing TRVKE

calling hags out on manufacturing this hagmaxxing trend since they run the media and culture

literally this image

but with these women instead

and yes that last chick has a academic lecture you can goon to : https://www.uwindsor.ca/dailynews/2020-02-20/lecture-explore-media-millennial-women

The cutest monkeys in the world fight for scarce food

Hyenas hunt newborn, seconds old, wildebeasts

Can These Tortoises Avoid Being Boiled In Their Shell?

!rottingcorpses