This is so delusional and r-slurred it makes John Bolton look like a stable genius in comparison: Now that Nasrallah is dead, a president will be elected and it will solve everything.
The only times that Lebanon has barely functioned as a state is when there was consensus among the Christians, Shi'a, Sunnis, and Druze.
There's only been a few guys stupid enough to think they could "win" and dominate the whole country. They got killed once they seemed to be anywhere near to achieving that.
It's kind of hard to build up a functioning bureaucracy while everyone is cowering in bomb shelters.
People don't like to cooperate with American plans while American bombs are landing on them.
The President of Lebanon has never had the power to fix the country's real problems. In fact the constitution is set up to make sure they can't. You're going to have to keep dealing with Nabih Berri.
They desperately need lots of money. Nobody is going to lend money to them while they're getting bombed and everything will just get immediately destroyed.
I cannot emphasize this enough: Syria and Hezbollah are still capable of killing anyone in Beirut they want to. They may feel entitled to carry out assassinations given what has happened lately.
The only thing I'm wondering is if this is male autism like the "Whiz Kids" of the Vietnam War or vapid female r-sluration where midwit women from rich east coast families have been promoted up through academia and think that means they actually know what the frick they're talking about.
There's a lot of people making decisions about this stuff who apparently have no idea that exactly what they're planning to do has been tried before and it didn't work. Or maybe they know and they just don't give a shit because it's never hurt the job prospects of neocons or R2P tards that they totally failed at everything and just ended up killing lots of people.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Exactly it won't solve anything so just bomb them harder
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
In my generation we were taught the "New Math" that involved problem solving strategies and this one doesn't seem logical to me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's very logical, less enemies annoying Israel, we get cool videos, libs get more ammo for their saviour complex, and muslims get to martyr for Allah. Literally no downsides
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's not how this works. If there's 10,000 enemies annoying Israel, tbqh, they're not gonna accomplish much. It's a really well-defended country (usually). If there's 1,000 enemies annoying Israel, there's still going to be constant fear and anxiety. A lot of the real damage is that constant stress, people not being able to live their lives normally. Killing 9,000 of them doesn't make your life 90% better.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ten thousand people are still a bigger threat than a thousand
But I agree that Israel should just kill every single person in the neighbouring countries so they can finally relax 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context