Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Everything in that article about the BBC is 100% true, so all the angry sneeding Redditors can do in the thread is attack the source (Telegraph) and the guy being quoted in the article (Danny Cohen).

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17397259519-FugmP1sf0nWA.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1739725951LDBXAMCBe2Oudg.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1739725952_LTCJTFfgrsqDA.webp

All of these people should be fired out of a cannon into the sun. Imagine any of this being your braindead response to an article because it raises many uncomfortable facts about your "side".

Pictured: Their side: :#soyjihadi:

Hey /u/Spamgrenade, do you find it "personal and overblown" that your beloved publicly funded news organization sympathizes with literal murderers and celebrates their release as if they are equally oppressed as Hamas's innocent victims, all of which is documented in this news article? Or did you not actually read it because it's in the Telegraph?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Every thread about anything that goes against the narrative in the main UK subreddits either gets people going "what do you mean by this?" to try and get you to say something they can report or "the problem here isn't that those girls got r*ped its that you posted a torygraph link".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I concur. Death to the BBC

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.