Unable to load image

Science shows that non-uggo students get better grades :marseypretty::!marseybow:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32880510

Highlights

• I examine the relationship between university students’ appearance and grades.

• When education is in-person, attractive students receive higher grades.

• The effect is only present in courses with significant teacher–student interaction.

• Grades of attractive females declined when teaching was conducted remotely.

• For males, there was a beauty premium even after the switch to online teaching.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16841353258374286.webp

Abstract

This paper examines the role of student facial attractiveness on academic outcomes under various forms of instruction, using data from engineering students in Sweden. When education is in-person, attractive students receive higher grades in non-quantitative subjects, in which teachers tend to interact more with students compared to quantitative courses. This finding holds both for males and females. When instruction moved online during the COVID-19 pandemic, the grades of attractive female students deteriorated in non-quantitative subjects. However, the beauty premium persisted for males, suggesting that discrimination is a salient factor in explaining the grade beauty premium for females only.

Concluding remarks

This paper has shown that students’ facial attractiveness impact academic outcomes when classes are held in-person. As education moved online following the onset of the pandemic, the grades of attractive female students deteriorated. This finding implies that the female beauty premium observed when education is in-person is likely to be chiefly a consequence of discrimination. On the contrary, for male students, there was still a significant beauty premium even after the introduction of online teaching. The latter finding suggests that for males in particular, beauty can be a productivity-enhancing attribute.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517652200283X/pdfft?md5=d3f53c2b5d308049b741ef583e246748&pid=1-s2.0-S016517652200283X-main.pdf

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517652200283X

46
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Could you please stop rewriting article titles in baity, editorialized ways? As commenters have pointed out, the way you editorialized this one has essentially ruined the thread. Worse, you've been doing it repeatedly

:#marseynerd:

We take submission privileges away from accounts that do this. It's against the site guidelines, which ask you to "Please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize."

:#marseyjanny2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.