Unable to load image

Science shows that non-uggo students get better grades :marseypretty::!marseybow:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32880510

Highlights

• I examine the relationship between university students’ appearance and grades.

• When education is in-person, attractive students receive higher grades.

• The effect is only present in courses with significant teacher–student interaction.

• Grades of attractive females declined when teaching was conducted remotely.

• For males, there was a beauty premium even after the switch to online teaching.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16841353258374286.webp

Abstract

This paper examines the role of student facial attractiveness on academic outcomes under various forms of instruction, using data from engineering students in Sweden. When education is in-person, attractive students receive higher grades in non-quantitative subjects, in which teachers tend to interact more with students compared to quantitative courses. This finding holds both for males and females. When instruction moved online during the COVID-19 pandemic, the grades of attractive female students deteriorated in non-quantitative subjects. However, the beauty premium persisted for males, suggesting that discrimination is a salient factor in explaining the grade beauty premium for females only.

Concluding remarks

This paper has shown that students’ facial attractiveness impact academic outcomes when classes are held in-person. As education moved online following the onset of the pandemic, the grades of attractive female students deteriorated. This finding implies that the female beauty premium observed when education is in-person is likely to be chiefly a consequence of discrimination. On the contrary, for male students, there was still a significant beauty premium even after the introduction of online teaching. The latter finding suggests that for males in particular, beauty can be a productivity-enhancing attribute.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517652200283X/pdfft?md5=d3f53c2b5d308049b741ef583e246748&pid=1-s2.0-S016517652200283X-main.pdf

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517652200283X

46
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I knew I was hot, thanks for confirming science

Here's my theory for why hot chicks got worse grades remotely while hot dudes remained the same: Most teachers are women, so they're still thirsting over Chad and giving him good grades to get in his good grace. The hot chicks got good grades by manipulating nerds to let them cheat so remote hurt them

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Its because straggot men simp for hot foids and cant control their peepee when physically near them

Everyone, male or female, admires attractive men. But more importantly chads are superior to high-mutational-load nerds in every way. The hot guys are genuinely smarter. They probably have less mental illnesses too.

"Nerds are smart, attractive people are dumb" is nerd cope and Hollywood

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There's a reason why most doctors are pretty attractive

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

These are university engineering students, the vast majority of professors are probably male

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Or male attractiveness (and not female attractiveness) is correlated with intelligence

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.