Rly tho this is horrifying and a good reminder of why QA and code reviews are important. Imagine trusting your life to a program written solo by some random neurodivergent "code hobbyist."
Rly tho this is horrifying and a good reminder of why QA and code reviews are important. Imagine trusting your life to a program written solo by some random neurodivergent "code hobbyist."
Now playing: Boss Bossanova (DKC2).mp3
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More people argue, convincingly, that the lesson is "don't rely on a single implementation for a critical safety function." Even if the software was perfect, what if a sensor reports incorrectly, like on the crashed 373 MAX jets?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
For sure, there should have been multiple failsafes, including hardware ones, like the vid mentions. But I'm just a programmer so the absolute r-sluration of the software irks me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I haven't seen the video, but I'm very familiar with this story (and the removal of hardware safeguards from the troublesome model).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Your post has rendered me completely and utterly impotent. Nowhere in that cesspool of cute twinkry did I encounter anything even resembling intelligent thought. I physically cannot open reddit with these chodes inhabiting it. My quality of life is now quantitatively worse that it was before I was exposed to what is essentially the intellectual equivalent of a
offing themselves.
Snapshots:
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
ghostarchive.org (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context