Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I hadn't heard of this dude before this, is he another grifter or legit?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i mean his ideological opponents would call him a grifter but I've seen his video from 14 years ago before all these nonsense and when /r/politics wasn't astroturfed to bits: https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/ezfg7/ted_talk_the_difference_between_liberals_and/?sort=controversial

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/ezfg7/ted_talk_the_difference_between_liberals_and/c1c628y/?sort=controversial

youtube, facebook, and other non-niche sites where people leave comments make me sad. I'm sad because I see how stupid the average person is.

/r/politics was always r-slurred lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Haidt is absolutely based.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He's legit. For years I used to direct people to this 2008 article, and Pinker is heavily cribbing from Haidt's research on moral intuitions:

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/13/magazine/13Psychology-t.html

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They are all cribbing from the Incerto Series and Daniel Kahneman

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He's legit and radical centrist pilled

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseytom:

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.