Googlers explain why they launch products and then abandon them

https://x.com/petergyang/status/1576985038511448064

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18379394

48
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I’m gonna launch my nutz in ya mouth

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseynut:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hasn't this been known for ages already? In megacorps there's a ton of internal competition and "innovation" is what gets you noticed.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah. It’s pretty crazy how the top brass just doesn’t care, but I guess it’s fine as long as search ads and gmail are ok

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They do care. But the issue is that it's much easier to get recognized for high skill for doing "new to the world" innovations within your company rather than run the business shit that often has nebulous business value (stopping a critical system from failing = $0 incremental revenue impact!) This isn't a trivial problem to solve.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It’s not trivial but everyone has known this about them for a long time and it doesn’t seem to change at all.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the top brass got where they are through "innovating", why would they change it?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeh, if you remember the "I spent $ 50.000 on two pags of bland globohomo web design" guy from a while back, he had a blogpost complaining about the exact same thing during his time at Google.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lol that guy is such a chump

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He's now on a new adventure trying to hire a support guy, spending r-slurred amounts of money and effort on dumb software and services as per.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Support staff is a solved problem. Just hire some white b-word to cry at customers it’s really that easy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He's also paying a cartoonist and editor for his blog

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseycringe2: i know this kind of person loool

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I remember talking about this with some googlers back in the day. This happens everywhere, careerism is cancer and google has plenty of cancer to go around

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>careerism is cancer

Ok you play the janny and clean up my bugs then, while staying senior eng until your retirement.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not a codecel but give me a googler salary and a handie and I will janny those bugs that scare you

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why are people acting like this is a bad thing? When you're a trillion dollar megacorp the best way to stay at the top is to throw shit at the wall until something sticks.

Otherwise your handful of products cap out on potential and the well runs dry until you end up like yahoo.

Also for promotions to management, yeah an engineer launching a new project is more appealing than one who just heads one of a million maintenance teams.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Main issue facing these companies right now is the product bloat though. Facebook’s recent fall is not because they went down in revenue, but because costs are skyrocketing on projects that have 0 returns

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Facebook's recent fall is because they're losing Facebook users for the first time in history and Apple is killing their ads business.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But that's not true. Their revenue is flat (which is part of the correction) but they are massively down in net income because of costs.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But that's not true.

Which part?

Facebook Loses Daily Active Users For The First Time

Facebook says Apple iOS privacy change will result in $10 billion revenue hit this year

Wall Street is selling them because their explosive growth isn't happening anymore. Facebook forecasted weak revenue growth and took an immediate hit.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Their revenue is flat. It cost them this year's gains, but not anywhere near that amount. That's a legal number for a lawsuit.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah but you need to actually throw the shit and not just make a big show of picking it up and dropping it the instant you get promoted to a different shit pickup position.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You really don't as long as the project is on the other side of the campus and it stays alive just long enough for you to do the same with an even bigger project

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I mean yeah, that's how it works for you, but it's bad for the company in the long run.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyfluffy:

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.