Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseypoggers:

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The globohomo cannot let twitter allow free speech before the midterms

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It would definitely help get people to the polls if they let everyone go back to saying what they wanted on Twitter

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

musk isn't part of globohomo?

also, globohomo can't allow free speech ever, musk isn't going to allow free speech. lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Musk is too fricking crazy to be part of organizations like that

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

globohomo took down the twin towers, plus WTC7, with explosives, on recorded video ... and most people still think planes caused that shit.

u'd have to be seriously too fricking crazy not to join

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the planes were holograms is my fav galaxy brain 9/11 take

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i'm now skeptical that it was a plane that hit the pentagon: ... at the very least we should have good video evidence confirming this, but the fbi refuses to release anything despite it being a 20yr old event that's been "completely solved", and we spent decades in war over. lol

planes def hit the towers, no doubt. they didn't cause the collapses however.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Go back to fricking sheep.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

truth hurts don't it, people u know died for literally nothing.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The pentagon is def sus. There was way too little debris there.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Crazy not to join, psychopath to join

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

lol, u think musk's not a psychopath?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nope, from his interviews and twitter shit he seems like a raging capitalist, an butthole and a bipolar nutjob but he's not a psychopath. He seems genuine in some romantic concepts he holds and it's obvious he's not trying to impress anyone. Psychopaths are way more calculated, that dude's not calculated, he probably decided to buy twitter now because the twitter NATO bots pissed him off.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

certainly takes a level of psychopathy to be raging capitalist

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Either psychopathy or autism. With him it's the second imo.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

did you guys forget that globohomo is something you made up

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

go back to shleep

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseybobpage:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i played human revolution twice, and mankind divided once ... and did not get the reference. :marseysigh:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's from the original r-slur.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i loled at the gfx

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It was a good game for the time.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He’s clearly not or the Reddit hivemind wouldn’t be under orders to hate him now

Free enough to let trump back on us good enough

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I can't even follow wtf is going on with this anymore.

So the Twitter board refused because Musk wanted to close by Oct 28 but the Twitter board wants to close by Oct 10? Surely going to an actual trial will drag it out beyond that anyways.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Elon's "new" deal is the same deal as before but contingent on Twitter dropping the lawsuit. But the lawsuit is about Elon pulling out of the deal improperly before, so Twitter doesn't have a lot of faith that he'll stick to it this time. Twitter would rather go through the courts and get an order requiring Elon to go through with the deal than take his word again, and the fact that he's offering this deal means that his team doesn't like his chances at trial. What will likely actually happen is Elon will move forwards with the deal to some more advanced stage, like putting the money in escrow or something, then the lawsuit will be dropped when Twitter is sure that he really can't pull out again.

Also note that it doesn't matter to Twitter how much money they spend on legal fees since when it's all over Elon will own twitter and be responsible for those anyways.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I didn’t know Twitter was suing musk for pulling out. Wouldn’t it have been decided in favor of musk or even thrown out because Twitter lied about their worth and obstructed him numerous times from completing the deal?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No lol if you sign a contract to acquire a Delaware company - unless it’s absolutely fricked to the point of having a material adverse effect on the value - the Delaware courts will make you buy it. The material adverse effect clause has only ever been relevant in one case ever. Also, Twitter never lied about bots. Even if their methodology is dogshit and found 5% of users were bots when it was actually 8% or whatever, they still didn’t lie on their SEC reports about the bots (the claim isn’t ‘x% of our users are bots’, it’s ‘according to our methodology x% of our users are bots’). Musk’s lawyers were grasping at straws and it showed in the filings.

Obviously if bots were actually like >50% of MAU in actuality, MAE would probably be an easier claim to make. But a discrepancy of a few % isn’t a big deal in Delaware court eyes.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

if bots were actually like >50% of MAU in actuality

Praying for this outcome :marseyinshallah:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Actually, it's probably going to go the other way. Twitter was playing a bit fast and loose with the bot calculations, but they gave Musk all the raw data (including the "fire hose", a stream of every single tweet as it's posted in real time) to analyze. It was then Musk's job to analyze it differently if he wanted to. But by the time he got around to doing that he'd already signed the papers, including signing away his right to do any further due diligence (normally if you want to do more analysis you would postpone signing this, but the whole deal was fast-tracked and apparently Musk was OK with this).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseybigbrain:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Better to continue to not make a profit then let an edgy African American own the public square.

:#marseyglobohomo:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I fricking love edging.

:#marseycapynut:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wtf is even going on with this entire ordeal it's so dumb

>Elon says heck buy Twitter

>Elon confirms his purchase

>Elon backs out of the purchase

>Shareholders force Elon to go on with the purchase after all

>Elon confirms his purchase (again)

>Twitter denies him

Wtf man? Some goofy butt looney toons tier bullshit

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.