Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Taking internet content at face value in 2022

You can't fix r-slurred

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The ads also contained claims designed to discourage voter turnout, such as claims that the election results could be hacked or the outcome was pre-decided.

Discussing the possibility of electoral fraud is now misinformation.

Thank you, fair and unbiased, " human rights watchdog Global Witness and the Cybersecurity for Democracy Team (C4D) at New York University."

:#marsey1984:

Also, I hate these kinds of studies. If you want to find systemic bias, you'll need to compare the total ads accepted and rejected, not the 20 ads you yourself submitted. It's like the r-slurred "systemic :marseybiast:" sociologists that submit same resumes with different names.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Election rigging claims would depress rightoid turnout, so what's their beef?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No... shut up, I'm not from ruqqus. This is stupid, you're stupid. You are hurting my feelings. you have no proof that I'm from ruqqus. why would you accuse me like that. You're a toxic person... So what if I'm from ruqqus and you are right about that? That doesn't devalue my bussy does it? I just want to spew unfilterd opinions under drama-posts and then pretend I'm being ironic, please just let me have this, please don't out me as a ruqqoid, please, I'm litterally begging you.

Snapshots:

https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/y9xlyx/facebook_and_tiktok_are_approving_ads_with/?sort=controversial:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.