I can't fricking even lmao
But the system works (to the extent it does work) because verification helps separate order from chaos. A blue checkmark is a vital time-out in the game of Twitter, signaling that you can reasonably believe a person, agency, or brand is actually speaking for itself. It removes the guesswork of scanning an account’s tweets and profile to gauge its veracity, especially in a fast-moving situation like a scandal, an election, or a public health emergency. It’s the seal of authenticity that gives serious accounts license to be playful, trusting that readers can check for their credentials.
And to be blunt, Twitter needs a verified user base more than a lot of individuals need those little blue checks.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Very true. Twitterinas love to use it as their way of coordinating which news stories will get published, which companies will get trashed, and who will get hyped as the next young/female/minority darling of the world. They want to be part of a global cabal running the world, but apparently $20/month is too much to pay for the privilege.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I legit need someone to enlighten my dumbass as to why paying few bucks for the check mark will he an issue for these people.
If anything, any corporation who does business or advertises themselves on twitter should pay proportionally to their size and name value. This includes journos and their shitty news company
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because they're #special and don't want to be treated like everyone else
agree
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context