Media Matters president confesses that a related activist group pressured advertisers into boycotting Twitter to the tune of $600-900MM

https://x.com/GoAngelo/status/1588696160520507392
102
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That would be some massive level of securities fraud if true. Even though there's a deal, Twitter would have to tell the public that revenue was expecting a 900 million shortfall for 2023. I don't think the executives would be that... well idiotic.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Can you elaborate. Me not good with geleogogy :marseyspecial:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The company is supposed to let the shareholders know of events in a timely manner that have an adverse, material effect on the company. When they sold basically no ads for 2023 after this event instead of $900 million worth, they would have to let the shareholders know that if the deal doesn't go through they own a company whose revenue is projected to decline by 25-30% YoY.

It's what the government pinned the Qwest CEO with after he pushed back against Bush's surveillance program. They cancelled a government contract with him and then said he didn't tell the shareholders quick enough for his own personal gain.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Have they had to release a quarterly report since the new fronts event? If not, I think there's an argument to be made that they're still being timely with informing investors of future revenue projections

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You still have to say something when large changes like that happen. But Q2 twitter earnings were released 7/22, and some comments say this event happened in May so they 100% new about it before.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:!#marseycringe2:

that sounds like a shareholder lawsuit to me

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>They cancelled a government contract with him and then said he didn't tell the shareholders quick for his own personal gain.

Wtf that's some bullshit

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

To be fair, he was selling shares and didn't tell the public about the deal saying he thought he could get the contract back (yeah right).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's a classic government - company interaction. There was a refining company where I grew up that sold some sort of product with an additive because the New Hampshire government asked them to, it turned out that additive was harmful and the government banned it like 10 years later. They then sued the refining company for 5 billion citing negligence among other things, the company had to settle due to litigation costs + the small change they lost meant the whole company went under.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This could get interesting but media matters is known for pedaling BS so I have my reasons to not believe and think this guy is just trying to farm some clout

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah, that's why I'm guessing it's BS. It's one of the for sure ways to go to prison as a c-suite person.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't think the executives would be that... well idiotic.

Have you seen this timeline we're in? We have a Facebook CEO sinking billions and can't even make legs for his wii-u clone.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Twitter would have to tell the public that revenue

Did you miss the part where Elon Musk bought Twitter? As in took it private?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Did you miss the part where rocket daddy bought Twitter? As in took it private?

Twitter still had to release earnings reports and it massively impacts the stock to learn that earnings projections should have been cut by 30%

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

it massively impacts the stock

Oh yeah, look at all that publicly-traded stock movement in the company that was taken private

![](/images/1667785075741027.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseygigaretard: you rn

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What, exactly, do you think stock is?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

dude if you show a house to a guy and he wants to buy and it then starts to be on fire you have to tell the guy before he signs a contract even though he saw the house before.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

a) lmao dude, this is not related to those statues

and b) irrelevant when relating to a deal

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

:marseyshitforbrains:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: Aquatic Ambience (Ephixa Remix) (DKC).mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.