Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34009009

I want to say this isn't 100% unexpected (some people show true behaviour openly only once they have nothing to lose). However, this does indicate a very deep flaw in our existing society i.e. giving certain individuals too much power; either via their job position or capital. This is why I think we should have higher tax rates and prevent at least an individual just to gain too much control by their capital. I would even be ok with 50%-100% tax rate above 100 million dollars net worth. There needs to be less imbalance in society, not more.

I keep seeing the same r-slurred ideas over and over again. It took literal decades for everyone to get on board with a 15% global minimum corporate tax and it's already been delayed a year. Who knows if it will ever come into effect or will have any of the claimed benefits.

The moment you start taxing people more than half their wealth (not income) based on arbitrary threshold (like why 100 mil? why not 50 or 10 or 125?), you'll see capital fight like there's no tomorrow.

Either get good or stay poor. Whining about wanting daddy government to improve your pathetic life by taking other people's money is a peepeelet move.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.