Unable to load image
Reported by:
  • JimothyX5 : Stupid, unfunny and completely unrelated to drama

Karla Ortiz and Sarah Andersen officially filed their lawsuit to try and ban AI art. (Yes, the woman who stole Dr. Strange from his creator, and the woman who makes those cringe "SarahScribbles" webcomics.)

https://old.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/10bj8jm/class_action_lawsuit_filed_against_stable

								

								

They're getting destroyed in court, aren't they?

103
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh boy time for a hungover look at this complaint :marseystinky:. Some of my initial thoughts: ND Cal normally is a good venue for codecels so I'm shocked they didn't try to forum shop a little. The class allegations for cert seems likely acceptable, but that will be at least 2 years of litigation. The whole thing seems like it's going to be a fight contingent on a reading of fair use, and claim 2 might make it as far as a jury. Claim 6 is a fricking :marseylolcow:, and they put claim 9 after 6 because class action parasite lawyers can't count.

I always feel weird on these ones since technically I do IP practice, but since it's in the :marseygigachad: realm of patents, I don't really deal with copyright except if it's a one-off. That being said, I love how adorablely non-complex the litigation is for it in comparison.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Idk I’ve talked to attorneys about litigation against big tech and their opinion was that ND Cal was a mixed bag for plaintiffs. Jury disposition is mixed and the tech literacy rate might be higher so a decent case might still file in ND Cal. Not that this is one of those.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link to the litigation for others

https://stablediffusionlitigation.com/

Edit: of course one of the plaintiffs is using a gender neutral Mx. Title

![](/images/16737202087608535.webp)

TIL also lol at dude winning a contest then pooping on artists

![](/images/16737203981294444.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is actually really insightful, thank you!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just like all class actions, what matters from a defense side initially is fighting against the certification of the class which will live or die by FRCP 23. Which I think StableDiffusion might have its balls in a vice because it's really hard to argue that this isn't appropriate for a class. The type of alleged infrignment is identical across the spectrum, and I wouldn't be shocked if it makes it to that point.

That being said, it will 100% be an argument over whether or not fair use applies, and it will likely be appealed and fought over for quite a while.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: Tree Top Rock remix (DKC).mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.