Possibly the most dorky article I ever read. Equating wearing a helmet as a bad thing because it makes bicycling look scary is like saying wearing a seat belt makes it too intimidating for group X (women, minority, etc) to drive.
This is the opening paragraph, which sets the tone for the rest of the article
Last year, health officials in Seattle decided to stop requiring bicyclists to wear helmets. Independent research found that nearly half of Seattle’s helmet tickets in recent years went to unhoused people, while Black and Native American cyclists in the city were four times and two times more likely, respectively, than white cyclists to be cited.
...
Helmet mandates intimidate potential riders, they argued, by framing cycling as an activity so dangerous it necessitates body armor.
My brain is to big to risk getting damaged while riding, thank you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Well we all know they can't get away with saying wearing a helmet makes bicycling look super gay (it really does) so how do you expect them to phrase it?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context