Unable to load image

Bike helmets: what the science says about an American safety obsession | Hacker News

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34419406

Possibly the most dorky article I ever read. Equating wearing a helmet as a bad thing because it makes bicycling look scary is like saying wearing a seat belt makes it too intimidating for group X (women, minority, etc) to drive.

This is the opening paragraph, which sets the tone for the rest of the article

Last year, health officials in Seattle decided to stop requiring bicyclists to wear helmets. Independent research found that nearly half of Seattle’s helmet tickets in recent years went to unhoused people, while Black and Native American cyclists in the city were four times and two times more likely, respectively, than white cyclists to be cited.

...

Helmet mandates intimidate potential riders, they argued, by framing cycling as an activity so dangerous it necessitates body armor.

My brain is to big to risk getting damaged while riding, thank you

:marseybiker::marseybigbrain:

128
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Caring about whether you look lame outside of specifically social situations is foid/teenager tier behavior. I'm fine looking like a dork if I'm share the road with cars. I hope this doesn't turn into another culture war issue though

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Neurodivergent hands typed this comment.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I hope it does and i hope it creates drama in the cycling communities

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Post as a driver that you think cyclists should have to wear helmets if they want to share the road.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>If I hit a cyclist I would feel bad but, y'know things happen. Nothing that can be done. :marseyjoint:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The real culture war issue is whether you put your helmet straps over or under your sunglasses.

:!#marseyjones:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Over

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nah, imagine how fun it would be:

>Despite making up only 13% of cyclists, unhoused and BIPOC individuals comprise 51% of cycling fatalities. This is evidence of institutional racism.

>:derpprocessing: How many of them were wearing helmets?

>:marseynpcmad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Mutts law.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Chuds don’t bike so it’ll be a lib civil war.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyagreefast:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So long as you don’t have the biker unitard I think you’re good in 99% of social circles

If you do the only consideration is having anything less than 60 miles on an odometer when your feet leave the pedals

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the coolest people I know all have a bike unitard

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I’m not here to read your L’s

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They are all IRL dramachads but go off ig

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You ride bicycles?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Helmets are bulky and 4 strags

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Try to make it into a culture war thing. Post on Twitter about how bike helmets are a feminine trait pushed by liberals

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Helmet mandate makes it less straggy to wear them. Now your just complying with the law instead of doing it freely and therefore being a :marseynerd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: Aquatic Ambience (A Hint of Blue remix) (DKC).mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.