Unable to load image

Robotic Lawyer cowers in the face of :marseyjudge:

https://www.npr.org/2023/01/25/1151435033/a-robot-was-scheduled-to-argue-in-court-then-came-the-jail-threats

Guess the founder didn't really want the Unauthorized practice of law charge, he just wanted attention :marseyattentionseeker:. Score another one for the Saul Goodmans of the world.

Relevant orange site: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34529340

26
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

AI will phase out lawyers. It's not one of those jobs where people will say "I'd rather a real person" like a doctor or nurse. People will be happy to not pay ridiculous amounts of money for a lawyer that builds your defense 1 hour before your case gets called up. Grifters gotta protect their grift.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

AI will phase out lawyers

I can't find the original post but there are stats that show Lawyers will be one of the early groups to be phased out. A good deal of their work is referencing existing case law and current systems can do that with the bare minimum of user management.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I actually have talent so my experience of Chat GPT is noting how it's a hack. Yet a random "defend this guy against murder charges" prompt, with details, might be better than a shitty lawyer? Not sure.

:#marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It was gonna be used to help someone get out of a traffic ticket lol. This is 100% lawyers trying to protect their grift.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There was no way this was gonna work in it's current form: someone in your earpiece telling you what to say.

There's definitely a frickload that ML models can do to help in the legal field but having a language model literally representing you isn't gonna happen (!remindme 1 year)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I will be messaging you on 26.01.2024, 18:47 UTC to remind you of this comment

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh shit lmao I was just using a redditism I didn't know we have this

No way this site doesn't implode by then tho

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

🤓🤓 heres an argument 4 u bud: both sides r massive cute twinks 👌😂[1][2]

Citations:

  1. True (2016)

  2. Fact (1981)

lmao @ u 👈👈👈 You were put down, in the future please refrain from discussing subjects you have no education in

Snapshots:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34529340:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: Boss Bossanova (DKC2).mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.