Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

General sentiment is rdramapilled though, they even highlight how all social media needs to be banned for underagestrags because the peer influence can overcome strict parenting.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Strag or bait?

[–] PriestOfTheBeast 1 point 8 hours ago

It's helpful for LGBT teenagers to have others like them to talk to, and they might not know any other LGBT people irl.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseymanysuchcases:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They can't object on principal anymore, only by it's effects of certain protected populations.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I would've thought Reddit would be against it because it would eliminate half of their userbase

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

he's right, but I'm also not looking forward to whatever system they'll attempt to put in place to "protect the kids" from accessing the naughty parts of the internet

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ideally phones would do a biometric scan to validate if you're 18 before letting you on the internet and if you fail it detonates to put you in a coma.


Give me your money and I'll annoy people with it :space: https://i.rdrama.net/images/16965516366194396.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

17 is too early

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Deputy surgeon generally probs disagrees


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17035381209726467.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Children shouldn't be on social media at all. It's a home problem, though. Parents shoudln't be using the internet as a shitty babysitter

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Children shouldn't be on "social media'

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This clown is a sarcastic, disingenuous individual, don't even waste your time responding to him. He's not courageous or intelligent enough to debate issues and theories in an honest, straightforward way, so he (?) hides behind his defense mechanisms… in this case, playing a sarcastic, incoherent punk/rebel who makes no sense (because he's not trying to). Seems he's trying to draw attention to himself, and discredit facts and opinions he doesn't like by belittling them, as opposed to refuting them or making rational counter-arguments like us adult folks. He reminds me of an annoying, 15 year-old little shit desperate for attention, but lacking the wisdom or life experience to say anything intelligent enough to actually contribute to the conversation, or be useful to anyone. Don't waste your time!! Hope that helps. 🙂

Snapshots:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34570943:

https://x.com/CNN/status/1619738404530298882:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This doesn't pass the the turing test.I I know who it is.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.