emoji-award-marseywholesome
emoji-award-marseytrain
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But the ultimate aim of chatbots lies in internet search, experts believe - replacing pages of web links with one definitive answer.

This sounds r-slurred

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At the end of the day it's another product that seems futuristic and impressive but has actually very little practical use. It won't be any more productive to have a fake chat with your computer than it is to just type 'cactus water how often' or whatever you're looking for.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's frightening that they sell it as something positive :marseysad2: Stupid CHUDS you don't need to look into things! Our AI overlord will just tell you the curated and approved answer we decided to give you!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We are literally so fricked

The rightoids are smug posting because they recaptured Twitter or something meanwhile the libs are literally programming globohomo AI

Decades behind

I better get to put my brain in a jar and be immortal or something due to this shit otherwise imma be pissed

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

New brain jar update broke adblock.

Early adopter jars aren't compatible with cyborg bodies.

Jar detected wrongthink. Now i have to rent my brain out for cloud computing to pay the fine. :marseydarkxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I have now been radicalized, thanks

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think they just nerfed their own search engine since they basically have no competition in order to make these chatbots just seem more amazing because trying to search for simple decisive stuff has become r-slurred, it's like windows-10-search-w/start-menu levels of bad now, and it really just started to feel that way over the last 3 years or so.

The kicker won't be that the bot is good, it will just seem good because it actually has access to google classic.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Unlike with links, which they can't and dont curate, right?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

...which was bad enough, but this is orders of magnitude worse

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I just googled it and it turns out its significantly better

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

lol imagine the countries trying to make Google/Facebook/etc pay for linking to news and displaying snippets. If this happened, people would just ask the chatbot to summarize the news and there would not even a link to follow back.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not even that, it's trained on data from web searches. It can't exist without them. Or at the very least, it can't be kept up to date without that data

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

One True ™ answer :#marsey1984:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

that is... a very unsettling goal

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's trying to be an interactive wikipedia. Not that bad of a goal and just as low quality. :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.