WTF is "Glaze"?
Glaze is the latest and greatest weapon in the artcels defensive and holy crusade against AI art. The "TL;Not a dweeb" is that it glazes art with shrooms-infused nut, so when AI ingests it as training material it acts funny.
This is supposedly "barely visible"
(And is supposedly already reversible, hearsay though so I can't confirm)
Drama?
It gets spicy. Glaze is scared of making it open source because something something protect artists this, something something we're a bunch of cute twinks that. As seen here.
https://twitter.com/ravenben/status/1636358951192150016#m
While not including code for an academic project makes them cucks to begin with, they explicitly commited copyright infringement by not making the source available
The Reddit thread goes over this, but someone de"compiled" (lol python) it, and there's explicitly copied code from another, GPL project. Including exact method names and typos. Indefensible evidence basically.
The knee is bent, but the wrong way
https://twitter.com/ravenben/status/1636439335569375238
This is brought to their attention, and they promise to rewrite the front end
Which is fricking stupid, and like most CS majors, he's a fricking moron
GPL applies to the entire project. It's a viral license
And they use stolen backend code too from the same project
These are the people concern-grifting about AI "copyright infringement" btw
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Holy shit, I didn't even realize how much this shit destroys art
This woman is singing its praise and it absolutely ruined her artwork lmao
Originals
The wavy butt shit it produced
Maybe it's Twitter compression? I don't know, I'm r-slurred, but there's no way this is what these people claim "is imperceptible"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Kind of hard to tell without seeing the original. Could just be shit artwork.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
But if you close your eyes
Does it almost feel
like nothing changed
at all
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm going to catch some flack here but I don't see a difference
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the paint strokes are different and probably easier to notice in the area around the eagle's head
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I kinda see it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It might be hard to see on mobile but the one on the left has like water splatters on it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Fair enough the problem is that in a painting those splashes can be intentional so its hard to tell lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah but the splashes are the only countermeasures against AI lol
I think there are more pics where it’s noooticeable
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yea, it looks way worse without brush strokes masking it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Can you really not tell? The glazed one has a texture the original doesn't has.
I guess being an oil painting masquerades it a bit, but they look noticibly different to me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
King shit right here
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Lol the output looks like it's been put through one of those basic stylise filters that have been in Photoshop since 2003
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context