emoji-award-marseywholesome
Unable to load image

Artcels already taking heavy losses, as their c*m-glaze AI deterrent violates the license of code it stole

https://old.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/11sqkh9/glaze_is_violating_gpl?sort=controversial

WTF is "Glaze"? :marseytribute:

Glaze is the latest and greatest weapon in the artcels defensive and holy crusade against AI art. The "TL;Not a dweeb" is that it glazes art with shrooms-infused nut, so when AI ingests it as training material it acts funny.

This is supposedly "barely visible" :marseysmug:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16790207944444408.webp

(And is supposedly already reversible, hearsay though so I can't confirm)

:m#arseydrama: Drama?

It gets spicy. Glaze is scared of making it open source because something something protect artists this, something something we're a bunch of cute twinks that. As seen here.

https://twitter.com/ravenben/status/1636358951192150016#m

While not including code for an academic project makes them cucks to begin with, they explicitly commited copyright infringement by not making the source available :marseydicklet:

The Reddit thread goes over this, but someone de"compiled" (lol python) it, and there's explicitly copied code from another, GPL project. Including exact method names and typos. Indefensible evidence basically.

The knee is bent, but the wrong way :marseylaugh:

https://twitter.com/ravenben/status/1636439335569375238

This is brought to their attention, and they promise to rewrite the front end

Which is fricking stupid, and like most CS majors, he's a fricking moron

GPL applies to the entire project. It's a viral license

And they use stolen backend code too from the same project :marseyeyeroll:

These are the people concern-grifting about AI "copyright infringement" btw :marseyxd:


Give me your money and I'll annoy people with it :space: https://i.rdrama.net/images/16965516366194396.webp

148
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Holy shit, I didn't even realize how much this shit destroys art

This woman is singing its praise and it absolutely ruined her artwork lmao

Originals

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FrS5x0-aAAMuVi0?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FrS5x0_aYAA6PjA?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FrS5x0-agAApiS6?format=jpg&name=large

The wavy butt shit it produced

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FrS5w8FaYAA1oci?format=jpg&name=large

Maybe it's Twitter compression? I don't know, I'm r-slurred, but there's no way this is what these people claim "is imperceptible"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16790281317726638.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

King shit right here

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm going to catch some flack here but I don't see a difference

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1679056393676371.webp

the paint strokes are different and probably easier to notice in the area around the eagle's head

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:m#arseysquint:

I kinda see it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It might be hard to see on mobile but the one on the left has like water splatters on it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Fair enough the problem is that in a painting those splashes can be intentional so its hard to tell lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah but the splashes are the only countermeasures against AI lol

I think there are more pics where it’s noooticeable

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yea, it looks way worse without brush strokes masking it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Can you really not tell? The glazed one has a texture the original doesn't has.

I guess being an oil painting masquerades it a bit, but they look noticibly different to me

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But if you close your eyes

Does it almost feel

like nothing changed

at all

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Kind of hard to tell without seeing the original. Could just be shit artwork.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lol the output looks like it's been put through one of those basic stylise filters that have been in Photoshop since 2003

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.