Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Then it was removed against her will

>But it wasn’t to last. In 2013, NeuroVista, the company that made the device, essentially ran out of money. The trial participants were advised to have their implants removed. (The company itself no longer exists.)

I just skimmed the article but I didn't find where it shows how it was removed against her will?

I suppose the company went bankrupt and their assets were being sold to pay their debts, and some of these assets were inside people's head. I still don't see how this isn't an enormous violation of body autonomy, but I also suppose that the creditors would be granted some sort of compensation for the assets and she didn't have the money to pay.

Maybe they explain it in the article but I ain't reading.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Foids have no agency anyway

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah like, it's not her property.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.