Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Meanwhile, farmer Chris Achter argued that the Emoji response was a sign that he had received the contract, not that he had read it nor agreed to it. Mickleborough countered this by showing evidence of Achter agreeing to previous contracts through text messages, although none using a thumbs-up Emoji.

how the frick is this possibly a valid counterargument

"but your honor look at these other cases where he used words to accept a contract therefore this emoji is sufficient"

frick r-slurred judges

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why did the farmer not follow up by rejecting the contract?


:!marseybooba:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why didn't the other guy ask for some kind of explicit confirmation?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He did. He sent a message saying “please confirm contract” after sending the image

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And he didn't get an actual confirmation

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The chain of the events taken together would lead most to believe that’s an explicit confirmation.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because he already got one.


:!marseybooba:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.