Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think it's basically just a middle finger to IBM. It just says you can't take their open source IP and build a competing product with it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah just make it AGPL then.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

agpl isn't bulletproof, see amazon and mongo db

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I mean yeah, free software will produce something like that.

Amazon is going leech :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah just make it AGPL then.

:# :#marseytransrentfree: :#marseycry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:@#xpat:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A lot of companies have a big hate boner for any license that has the letters GPL in it. I'm kind of surprised anyone other than IBM, Pulumi, and Spacewalk even care. It pretty much just affects them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because some of us still foolishly believe in principles when it comes to software licensing.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

it's not foolish, unfortunately

it would be easier if software licensing were just some technical detail of no consequence that people are getting riled up for out of only a dogmatic dispute

radicals like RMS have this unfortunate capacity to be correct. any compromise with the corporation is the death of the technical power of the platform

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.