Unable to load image

post got jannied, check top comment for ghostarchive link Did it seem to any Indian that the Chinese interviewer was intentionally trying to make them fail? :marseytunaktunak: vs :marseychingchong: iq posting inside

https://www.teamblind.com/post/Did-it-seem-to-any-Indian-that-the-Chinese-interviewer-was-intentionally-trying-to-make-them-fail-20JXMVvF

[OP] Strange , but I gave 10 interviews in past ,

AIRBNB : Non Chinese interviewer : Passed

Meta : Chinese : Failed

Netflix : non Chinese : Passed

DataBricks : Non Chinese : passed

Nvidia : Chinese: Failed

Disney: Chinese : Failed

Apple : Non Chinese: Passed

Oracle : Non Chinese : Passed

Something is wrong , I can say where ever chinese intervieer , God promise I have done better but they are failing me.

Advocating for Mixed Races in onsite interview panels.

I might sounds like racist ! But this is true experience and what I felt shared.

Tech companies needs to rethink ! This is big issue and don't create lobby.


Chinese :marseychingchongsupremacy: smells logical fallacy and bullshit immediately. Lots of Indian design don't work or have a tons of fundamental flaws such as race conditions, or applying the wrong solutions to wrong problems.

Source conducted interview for the past 10 years

That's why there are so many Chinese running US tech companies and not Indians. Name me one thing China has invented that's not a copy of an American product

Indians are smooth talkers, that's why they run companies, not because their code is great

Two things:

Indian CEOs don't own the company. The founders have a few hundreds times more wealth than indian ceo. Sundar maybe worth half a billion top but his wealth will never get to 100 billions like Larry or Sergei. Chinese are smart enough to not dream to be US billionaires slaves :marseycracka:

Second China economy is well above 7 times more than India, with similar population. Their IQ is way higher, they perform better in every metrics. So to call them out just from having Indian CEOs is extremely stupid (but i guess average IQ discrepancies explain a lot why you would think like this)

I think here is the problem, as a Indian , I think hire someone who can make impact for long term and learn from mistakes , otherwise I would have hired Robots

'Chinese smells logical fallacy and bullshit'

Did you seriously just type that out and generalize a race? Some of the dumbest SWEs I know are Chinese, and so are some of the smartest SWEs I know.

With 20 points difference in IQ :marseyrick:, 83 vs 103, the dum dum Chinese :marseybigbrain: will still smell fallacy easily from an average Indian :marseypajeet:. So from a statistic pov, yes what I say will hold true most of the time

Lol chinese got independence way before india. Stop your hatred before it consumes you fully to become an extremely racist mf. Chinas economy is great, and they are one of the smartest bunch surely, but they also suffer from their undemocratic process, we enjoy our freedom, and i can blurt modi sucks (if i want to) without being kidnapped and killed. So lets not just look at economy as a factor of IQ. That says a lot about your IQ though google. I guess google engineering has fallen off

Japan has the highest average IQ, and their economy is tumbling, talk about correlation is causation inference. Stupid mfs

IQ doesn't matter if your government won't allow you to share your ideas or start a business they don't like

Ha ha ! Chinese in China is labor of there government.

We Indian are free birds 🦅 , and think freely

Yeah, every time I see chaotic traffic in India -- free birds indeed


Chinese and Indian could be best friends…Dont be a victim of western anglo-Saxon propaganda

Plus Chinese are racist to Indians and look down on them. Nothing to do with with propaganda

Indians are racist to Chinese too and look down on chinese(chini/chapta)

But that's the result of the propaganda


This thread is about an Indian complaining that only other Indians want to hire them

🤣🤣🤣


If meta has 50% chinese, the probability of you having 5 Chinese interviewers are 1/2 ^5, which is 3.1%

The probability of you having 5 onsite loops at 5 different companies where there are 50% chinese swes and 100% chinese interviewers is 0.031^5 *100 percent.

Tldr: OP has low IQ and I don't believe this post

I cannot comprehend the response. Serious?

:marseysmoothbrain:

39
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Chinese are smart enough to not dream to be US billionaires slaves

:#marseycope:

Can I please be a "slave" for $500 million? I'll even wear heels.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.