Collection.map(()=>{}).filter(“ayyy lmao”)

https://twitter.com/themarcba/status/1722611523745640846

I haven't touched these in months so i used them wrong, also i typed this on my phone.

24
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>senior dev

>js

:marseyno:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

senior

5 years of experience

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

you're a big butt bwainlet if you tink swenior dwevs dwon't touch :marseygrass: JS lmfwao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Ctrl+F "immutable"

>0 results

Yeah I'm going to be employed for a while

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

my bussy is immutable because I'm UNVAXXED :marseystrong:


Give me your money and I'll annoy people with it :space: https://i.rdrama.net/images/16965516366194396.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>using .map().filter() instead of .filter().map()

:marseylaptopangry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseydisagreesuperspeed:

foreach masterrace represent

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is the sort of shit I think when I'm programming in Python and missing Ruby's block feature.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

im Scala, a .map method followed by a .filter method can be replaced with a single .collect method

:#capyautismchad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseykiwi:

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.