Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Darn, this is crazy.

he was not consistently candid in his communications with the board, hindering its ability to exercise its responsibilities

Huh, could he have been fudging some company metrics? This is basically calling him a liar. Guess we'll find out if they go under in a month's time :marseypraying:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's most plausible

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.