Unable to load image

Snap/Flatpak Super Giga AIDS inbound

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39446617

I had the idea to do something like this like six months ago. Snap/Flatpak are super vulnerable and people are using them to distribute crypto wallets.

24
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:
  • KatserKitty1987 : I use flat packs on my steam deck for easy updating of emulators

!codecels who even uses snap/flatpak? I sometimes use appimage because it's a lot less painful than trying to build a project written in some meme lang (seriously javascript has no place on the desktop)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sounds like bloat to me :marseyboomer:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I will occasionally use flatpak because I'm using a very specific distro for work and there often isn't a way to run the app when you account for all the dependencies. So I run a very small number of apps via flatpak.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

founder and CEO of https://biofoids4biofoids.com

Not many dependencies dor dykuntu eh?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@KatserKitty1987 : I use flat packs on my steam :marseyfreeman: deck for easy updating of emulators

Emulators are one of the few pieces of software :marseywindows: where :marseydrama: appimages/snaps make sense

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I like Flatpak for some things even packaged by the distro, mainly for faster updates. It also works very well in Fedora Silverblue.

I tried giving Snaps a fair shake a few times but it's just not very good, granted I believe it was the blogger of the above post who said "our single Firefox Snap package has more users than your entire distro" :marseydarkxd:

I prefer Snap's auto-update policy as well.

Fedora's method of Flatpaks for GUI apps and then toolbox for command line apps was decent enough.


Follower of Christ :marseyandjesus: Tech lover, IT Admin, heckin pupper lover and occasionally troll. I hold back feelings or opinions, right or wrong because I dislike conflict.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I tried giving Snaps a fair shake a few times but it's just not very good, granted I believe it was the blogger of the above post who said "our single Firefox Snap package has more users than your entire distro" :marseydarkxd:

What they don't tell you is 90% of those installs are from people who typed "apt install firefox" and assumed they'd get a deb and not a basket of aids.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I mean yeah, but it kind of puts it into perspective how many users of desktop Linux are just Ubuntu users. If snap is working fine for them, it's probably not as bad as loud neckbeards claim :marseyshrug:


Follower of Christ :marseyandjesus: Tech lover, IT Admin, heckin pupper lover and occasionally troll. I hold back feelings or opinions, right or wrong because I dislike conflict.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Snap is evil globohomo shit. It's a closed source repo owned by one company. I have my system set up to specifically BLOCK any attempted installation of Snap packages because some APT packages are really just scripts to download Snap...

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I did the same thing

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I considered it but it seemed a bit tarded to potentially install common dependencies 50 times over. I just use whatever package solution comes with the distro and run esoteric shit in a docker container

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I use snap because I'm lazy as frick and if apt does not have the version that I want then frick It, it's gonna be a snap because I can't be bothered to install it manually

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.